« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC  (Read 5082 times)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #30 on: October 16, 2014, 08:29:01 PM »
Number of doctors Cuba sending to Africa Ebola 3000
Australia 0
Logged

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #31 on: October 16, 2014, 08:37:34 PM »
Save your political crap for the general discussion section.
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #32 on: October 16, 2014, 08:46:10 PM »
10/10 , of the available garbage on offer , we could have made better use of our delistings as in asking Jacko or o hanlon to reconsider.  We have Fj s team armed to the teeth with draft picks to re stock what's become a veritable warehouse of talent at punt rd  :shh
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9982
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #33 on: October 16, 2014, 08:52:30 PM »
The only thing stupider than RFC not having a proper crack is the fools saying junk like 'no point tradin just for the sake of trading, need to find good players'.

Open your eyes. There was SERIOUS talent switching clubs this year. Captains, premiership players, all Australians and brownlow medalists FFS.

And we look at blokes like Grigg and say that he's 'off limits'. FMD.

I'd have taken any of Greenwood, Varcoe, Cooney etc over the likes of Grigg or Petterd.

Cooney on one leg is a better player than plenty of our blokes.

If guys like Stanley attract approx pick 20 surely we could stuff off Vickery for something around that mark. Conca too.


Especially after Richardson's mid-season BS comment about how we're going to be aggressive in the trades this year because we need to improve out list. We look like a pack of morons.

God dammit seriously.
Logged

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #34 on: October 16, 2014, 09:01:53 PM »
Quote from: bojangles17 on October 16, 2014, 08:46:10 PM
10/10 , of the available garbage on offer , we could have made better use of our delistings as in asking Jacko or o hanlon to reconsider.  We have Fj s team armed to the teeth with draft picks to re stock what's become a veritable warehouse of talent at punt rd  :shh

Armed to the teeth like Rambo and going to be smashing those late picks like he hunted fat cops with booby traps. Watch this space  :shh
Logged

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #35 on: October 16, 2014, 09:28:16 PM »
Quote from: Andyy on October 16, 2014, 08:52:30 PM
The only thing stupider than RFC not having a proper crack is the fools saying junk like 'no point tradin just for the sake of trading, need to find good players'.

Open your eyes. There was SERIOUS talent switching clubs this year. Captains, premiership players, all Australians and brownlow medalists FFS.

And we look at blokes like Grigg and say that he's 'off limits'. FMD.

I'd have taken any of Greenwood, Varcoe, Cooney etc over the likes of Grigg or Petterd.

Cooney on one leg is a better player than plenty of our blokes.

If guys like Stanley attract approx pick 20 surely we could stuff off Vickery for something around that mark. Conca too.


Especially after Richardson's mid-season BS comment about how we're going to be aggressive in the trades this year because we need to improve out list. We look like a pack of morons.

God dammit seriously.
On the surface you are right.  Information from a reasonable source, however, is that what the club is saying publically is very different to what actually occurred during discussions.
I'll just leave it at that.......
Logged
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #36 on: October 16, 2014, 09:37:25 PM »
Quote from: bojangles17 on October 16, 2014, 08:46:10 PM
10/10 , of the available garbage on offer , we could have made better use of our delistings as in asking Jacko or o hanlon to reconsider.  We have Fj s team armed to the teeth with draft picks to re stock what's become a veritable warehouse of talent at punt rd  :shh

Agreed. I hear picks 128 and 146 are now Ebola free and their lack limbs is no shortage for their determination.
Logged
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #37 on: October 16, 2014, 09:38:36 PM »
Pakistani refugee pick 168.

International class b
Logged

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #38 on: October 16, 2014, 09:42:54 PM »
Very good as they see this draft as a good one and were carful not to waste our picks or pay overs , if there was something there that was too good to pass on they would have gone for it.

What's with Adelaide, wasting top picks on players that probably would have been delisted - stupid. 
Logged

the claw

  • Guest
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2014, 09:43:57 PM »
lol 25 30 players changed hands and numerous picks and not one of em are good enough for us.

me i would have gone hard at hallahan ffs 47 and 49 cheap as chips., garlett 61 and 79 virtually nothing, and frawley f/a free to a good home. .would add james gwilt also free to a good home. giles for pick 53  or luke lowden  cheney a better propisuion than most of our hacks in defense.

it was a lost opportunity to find mature players add real depth and stay in the nd.

ah locked and loaded and those cherrys are as ripe as they will get. lol.
Logged

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #40 on: October 16, 2014, 09:48:32 PM »
Hallihan,  :lol we've got arnot in the ressies that can't crack our dream team midfield sonny Jim , some reference checks would underline he s a heck of a lot better performed at senior level that most if the second rate bums that switched clubs for no 7 picks et al :shh
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #41 on: October 16, 2014, 09:53:46 PM »
Has to be 0/10 or n/a cause we did nothing.

Dan Richardson has to go. Biggest handbrake the club has had since Craig Cameron.
Logged
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline Golfprotiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 659
  • Risking Head and Shin
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #42 on: October 16, 2014, 10:03:34 PM »
I thought from all reports we were going to be a player over the time, disappointed that nothing happened. Better mean something then.......  :whistle
Logged
Tommy Hafey - "There's nothing more tiger-ish than a bloody tiger, a wounded tiger''

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #43 on: October 16, 2014, 10:19:58 PM »
Quote from: Judge Roughneck on October 16, 2014, 09:38:36 PM
Pakistani refugee pick 168.

International class b

Will be cleared through customs along with picks 204, 258 and 320 following louse spray via aisle sweepings from Air Karachi staff
Logged
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #44 on: October 16, 2014, 10:37:31 PM »
I really hope we pick up some kids; whom can flounder in the two's for 6 years,
Unless of course dimmer is forced to play one of them thru a plethora of injuries to senior listed
champions.

Go you good things !

New RFC Mantra - 8 is great but 9 is fine!!
Logged
Caracella and Balmey.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »