Author Topic: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC  (Read 5036 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3744
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #61 on: October 17, 2014, 08:46:52 AM »


 :sleep
Exactly

Interesting to note that Ports 1st pick in the National Draft is 57 then 75.
They have their team, got Ryder and are very set.

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #62 on: October 17, 2014, 09:14:38 AM »
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-trade-2014-report-card-who-were-the-winners-and-losers-in-the-trade-and-free-agency-period/story-fn69a32t-1227092874309

RICHMOND — PASS

IN: Nil

OUT: Nil

DRAFT PICKS: 12, 33, 52, 70, 88, 106, 124

VERDICT: Well done to the medical staff who kiboshed a Titanic of a trade when they turned down Jack Trengove after a scan on his foot. Informed judges believe they offered pick 12 for David Armitage, and sniffed around Adelaide’s Scott Thompson. Club denies both. Now look to the draft to find a pacy midfielder and potentially a clever small forward. Could they have done more to get another hard inside mid? Look at their rivals — Hawthorn and Port all got appreciably better, so they need to extract significant outside from the likes of Conca, Vlastuin, Lennon, Vickery, Griffiths and Co.

5/10 its official you numpties

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #63 on: October 17, 2014, 09:50:55 AM »
5/10 to be adjusted in a year or two.

If they can bring in some real talent it could be 10/10, if they bomb out in the ND it could be a big fat zero.

OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #64 on: October 17, 2014, 09:51:09 AM »
Not a bad effort Ramos, reckon you can get this thread to 10 pages with the right amount of inciting

If you had any brains you would be filthy wif da club.  :o

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #65 on: October 17, 2014, 10:15:10 AM »


Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #66 on: October 17, 2014, 10:18:29 AM »
 :veryhappy

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #67 on: October 17, 2014, 12:12:48 PM »
RICHMOND

What they got: Nil

What they lost: Nil

Draft selections: 12, 33, 52, 70, 88, 106, 124

Bottom line: For all the talk about not being seduced by the amazing end to the season, they are yet to make any significant changes to the list. Only time will tell what the inactivity means for next year and beyond.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-trade-and-free-agency-2014-a-clubbyclub-guide-20141016-1171cu.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #68 on: October 17, 2014, 12:30:57 PM »
Stick to the footy topics and discussion ppl.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: How did you rate the trade period from the Richmond FC
« Reply #69 on: October 17, 2014, 05:59:05 PM »
i rate this draft a 9/10, equal to the size of feces that came of my date this morning.

As frustrating as it is was i couldnt give a stuff now. Season is over lads.

The only news i want to hear now, aside from FJ getting the sack, is the signatures of cotch, dusty and rance before round 1 next year. if we hit round 1 and some arent signed odds are one will whip out the party line "im not in a rush to sign until the end of the year"

Dan Richardson you are a hack but sign these guys up before xmas and you would have at least done something right.

Lose one and we are stuffed.



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.