interesting to read this thread and then the rance thread where the shoe is on the other foot.
Haha so true.
I'm not a fan of FA personally. The rich get richer...
Don't want Danger either, he'd be close to the most expensive player in the game and comes with a massive amount of risk as a result.
If we engage in FA, I'd rather we go for Selwood/Steven types than someone who'll derail our pay structure.
mate i would have been happy with a hallahan type for the midfield,we went for greenwood so why not hallahan.imo the hawks will rue letting him go just like they rue letting kennedy go.
when i looked at our backline without rance last yr well we had to go after frawley surely.our whole season could go to the dogs if hes injured.
imo james gwilt allowed to play a running third tall role an absolute steal.at stkilda in recent yrs hes been ruined by injury and when fit been asked to virtually play kp. go look at this bloke play 2010 2011 before injury. has to be better than grimes, batchelor dea newman and houli and boy he creates real competition for a gig.
finally what sml fwd do we have that has performed anywhere near garletts level. he should have been a priority.
they all went cheap and i for one would have been happy to have all 4 though not likely to happen.
thats not to say i would not like a player like danger. imo the opportunity is there to have both the frawleys garletts etc and target elite players like danger as we go.as a f/a danger would come for free.
