Author Topic: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?  (Read 2517 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #15 on: March 01, 2015, 02:07:18 PM »
So was Short and Castagna and Arnott.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #16 on: March 01, 2015, 02:23:44 PM »
So was Short and Castagna and Arnott.

To be honest Short was hardley sighted, yes he did a couple of nice things but he hardley set the world on fire.
Lambert and Arnot were the stand out rookies by a mile.

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #17 on: March 01, 2015, 07:04:49 PM »
Did Lambert play the full game out

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #18 on: March 01, 2015, 07:10:13 PM »
So was Short and Castagna and Arnott.

To be honest Short was hardley sighted, yes he did a couple of nice things but he hardley set the world on fire.
Lambert and Arnot were the stand out rookies by a mile.

I thought Shorty showed a bit actually..

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #19 on: March 01, 2015, 08:12:18 PM »
agreed
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #20 on: March 01, 2015, 08:37:25 PM »
Did Lambert play the full game out

Was rotated as they all were but yes outside the rotations yep played the entire game
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #21 on: March 01, 2015, 08:53:37 PM »
Did Lambert play the full game out
time on ground for some of our mids,  lambert 65 mins, arnot 64, hunt 90, lennon 77, grigg 57, petterd 48. miles 88, 

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #22 on: March 01, 2015, 09:01:36 PM »
So was Short and Castagna and Arnott.

To be honest Short was hardley sighted, yes he did a couple of nice things but he hardley set the world on fire.
Lambert and Arnot were the stand out rookies by a mile.

I thought Shorty showed a bit actually..
Took a couple of nice marks, jagged a good goal , not bad at all
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #23 on: March 01, 2015, 09:37:10 PM »
Thanks

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2015, 10:59:34 PM »
Decent start by Kane.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2015, 11:19:30 PM »
So was Short and Castagna and Arnott.

To be honest Short was hardley sighted, yes he did a couple of nice things but he hardley set the world on fire.
Lambert and Arnot were the stand out rookies by a mile.

I thought Shorty showed a bit actually..
Took a couple of nice marks, jagged a good goal , not bad at all

Yeah, his 5 possession game tore them a new one FFS :huh

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #26 on: March 01, 2015, 11:58:20 PM »
So was Short and Castagna and Arnott.

To be honest Short was hardley sighted, yes he did a couple of nice things but he hardley set the world on fire.
Lambert and Arnot were the stand out rookies by a mile.

I thought Shorty showed a bit actually..
Took a couple of nice marks, jagged a good goal , not bad at all

Yeah, his 5 possession game tore them a new one FFS :huh

What was his gametime? You've got to look a bit deep than possessions.
I was just looking for glimpses and liked what I saw from him as a small forward.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #27 on: March 02, 2015, 12:13:03 AM »
I picked all three.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #28 on: March 02, 2015, 09:12:41 AM »
So was Short and Castagna and Arnott.

To be honest Short was hardley sighted, yes he did a couple of nice things but he hardley set the world on fire.
Lambert and Arnot were the stand out rookies by a mile.

I thought Shorty showed a bit actually..
Took a couple of nice marks, jagged a good goal , not bad at all

Yeah, his 5 possession game tore them a new one FFS :huh

What was his gametime? You've got to look a bit deep than possessions.
I was just looking for glimpses and liked what I saw from him as a small forward.

Exactly.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Will we upgrade Matthew Thomas over Lambert ?
« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2015, 01:19:54 PM »
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH