All I said was *insert player* lives with them FFS.
You really don't get it do you or do you just refuse to accept what we've posted regarding the legal implications of posts like that because you don't like it?
Our advise on these matters came from a lawyer, not someone on social media, a journo or law student but a long term lawyer with decades of experience.
What you posted is unacceptable because of how you worded it and by naming someone - end of story
Your Essendon analogy is a poor one because people's views on Essendon were opinions/are based on a story that was in the public domain. Massive difference
Seriously, I don't know how many times we have to explain the difference.
And BTW, as of 6.45pm this evening this "rumour" is baseless and something that has been fabricated on social media (what a surprise)... so until that changes no names or clubs are to be mentioned on this site, no exceptiopns
Can I make it any clearer