Author Topic: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)  (Read 1592 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97306
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« on: April 14, 2015, 01:25:20 PM »
Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)

Watch here: http://www.afl.com.au/video/2015-04-13/tigers-lack-a-tough-a-mongrel



* Barrett - Post-match commentary from Hardwick has a 'sameness' about it. They're still talking about mistakes and rectifying them. After six years, I'm not sure they will.

* Lyon - Deledio and Edwards out of the side hurt them in an area they looked a bit shoddy in - polish and class.

* Lyon - Frustrated as a former forward with where they play Jack Riewoldt.

* Lyon - They didn't seem to have any excitement.

* Lyon - The query on Richmond is the lack of mongrel in the side. They've lost Jackson and King and for different reason Vickery has some physical presence but he's not in the side. Just want a bit more nastiness in that Richmond group.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2015, 02:29:22 PM »
They would be correct, especially the first one from Cunty Barrett
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19088
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2015, 04:07:53 PM »
Still remember when we hired Wallace thinking....."Well, if nothing else, at least he should put some mongrel into the side like he did at Footscray".....ten years and a change of coach later, still waiting.....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2850
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2015, 04:12:11 PM »
When can they elevate the biscuit? He's the battering ram we need and I'm pretty sure he likes the physical aspects of the game.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19088
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2015, 04:19:03 PM »
When can they elevate the biscuit? He's the battering ram we need and I'm pretty sure he likes the physical aspects of the game.

So Hardwick can stick him at forward pocket again then drop him for not playing like Breust, Ballantyne or Betts?
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2850
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2015, 04:38:34 PM »
When can they elevate the biscuit? He's the battering ram we need and I'm pretty sure he likes the physical aspects of the game.

So Hardwick can stick him at forward pocket again then drop him for not playing like Breust, Ballantyne or Betts?

hahahaha yeah that was unbelievable that day. I will go on the record and say that I think he will be very serviceable in the engine room as a battering ram. I don't think the biscuit is afraid of contact and when he did play last year he averaged 5 tackles a game (9 against Hawks when we got spanked) and his contestest vs uncontested possession ratio is around 50/50.

But yes being played out of position isn't good. they can't all be swingmen, and not every midfielder can be deployed as a crumbing forward. The biscuit can snag a goal here and there though.

Online the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4171
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2015, 05:03:29 PM »
Still remember when we hired Wallace thinking....."Well, if nothing else, at least he should put some mongrel into the side like he did at Footscray".....ten years and a change of coach later, still waiting.....
yeah not so sure getting  one player with mongrel will fix things though it sure would help, always nice to have one or two enforcers.  our real problem is we have too many who are soft and play bruise free footy.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2015, 05:22:26 PM »
I think most of us thought the same about hardwick instead we have them standing around waiting for the "game to open up" so they can get easy kicks

weak idiots
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3682
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2015, 05:40:39 PM »
Remember Steve O'Dwyer???????

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2015, 05:44:08 PM »
Yep.
He just has nfi how to recognise a kids natural game.

Instead he employs blokes on the list to fill his vacancies,vacancies created in his mind.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
  • In Absentia
Re: Tigers lack a 'tough mongrel' (afl site)
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2015, 01:37:32 PM »
Lyon spot on. No excitement. No highlights, boring football.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do