Was it a lucky win, a solid win or an amazing win?

[Stalin]

Lazy win.

I only saw bits,

But rance, deledio, vlastuin did not look lazy to me

[No More]

we played crap and won by 5 goals ... another 4 points in the depths of winter is a good result

[Stalin]

we played crap and won by 5 goals ... another 4 points in the depths of winter is a good result

Vs Carlton ....

[No More]

still 4 points

[Stalin]

still 4 points

Praise Geez

When Hampson kicked it into man on mark I was thinking might not end well

[mat073]

Boring win 

[mightytiges]

we played crap and won by 5 goals ... another 4 points in the depths of winter is a good result

x2.

Scrub all recordings of what was a shocking game, take the 4 points and move on to next week.

ps. Laugh at Collingwood and Carlton losing again  .

[Smokey]

still 4 points

Praise Geez

When Hampson kicked it into man on mark I was thinking might not end well

I went off when that happened.  Not because of the kick into the man, but the decision to call play on in the first place.  Hampson had barely got back behind the mark and hadn't moved one centimetre off his line before the maggot called play on and he was left with bugger-all room to kick when his opponent rushed him.

[🏅Dooks]

Geez is the Lord

[Penelope]

Carlton were lucky we played so crap and that they were not just smashed completely.

[Owl]

still 4 points

Praise Geez

When Hampson kicked it into man on mark I was thinking might not end well

I went off when that happened.  Not because of the kick into the man, but the decision to call play on in the first place.  Hampson had barely got back behind the mark and hadn't moved one centimetre off his line before the maggot called play on and he was left with bugger-all room to kick when his opponent rushed him.

yeah why the stuff was it called play on, he had barely started to go back for his kick, he didn't try to play on and the ump stuffed him over

[Yeahright]

Lucky again the opposition. Didnt have the kicking boots on

Unlucky we missed so many shots. Score should've been 21.0.126 beat Carlton 5.11.41 if we had our kicking boots on.

Do you only pay attention to the goals they miss?

[Stalin]

Lucky again the opposition. Didnt have the kicking boots on

Unlucky we missed so many shots. Score should've been 21.0.126 beat Carlton 5.11.41 if we had our kicking boots on.

Do you only pay attention to the goals they miss?

You can't get the concept if they were 7.2 instead of 2.7, things might not turn out identical?

[Penelope]

what about if we had kicked 7-2?

or if your auntie had balls?

[Yeahright]

Lucky again the opposition. Didnt have the kicking boots on

Unlucky we missed so many shots. Score should've been 21.0.126 beat Carlton 5.11.41 if we had our kicking boots on.

Do you only pay attention to the goals they miss?

You can't get the concept if they were 7.2 instead of 2.7, things might not turn out identical?

Then it would of been 71-44 and we still win. It's pointless saying hypotheticals. How many of their extra scores were as a result of them having the ball pinned in there forward 50 due the previously scored behind? How would we of responded to them kicking a goal rather than a behind, perhaps we pull our heads in? Why weren't we just as unlucky? We could of kicked even more goals than behinds?

Aren't we better than them due to our better kicking? The whole point of the game is to kick goals and that's what we did. They were poo for missing.

52 inside 50's to 36 and 21 to 16 scoring shots. Maybe we were unlucky because we should of scored more by all our extra inside 50's?