Author Topic: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?  (Read 4224 times)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #30 on: May 26, 2015, 08:27:15 PM »
Proven To be well and truly past it , if you think that this generation of young punks can relate to someone the age of their grandfather , you'd need your head read. It ain't the 80s no more  :banghead
If you're alluding to my post, it was firmly tongue in cheek.
j
No , was just a comment in general
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline DCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
  • Belle, Richmond PR manager
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #31 on: May 26, 2015, 08:28:10 PM »
One thing Mick needs is a holiday. He should take his wife to the French Riverina, kick back and enjoy.

Offline 1980

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #32 on: May 26, 2015, 08:52:59 PM »
Past his best. No thanks.

If he couldnt work with Buckley, those same issues will apply at Punt Rd.

Prefer that we target Matty Knights.
It's a bit different working for an incumbent coach than working for/ with a bloke you were tapped on the shoulder for.

Should we also get Leigh Matthews as an assistant? If Mick would do it maybe he would too?
I think we should get Sheeds.

Him too! Lets collect them all to help Dimma out. 

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8502
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #33 on: May 26, 2015, 10:24:12 PM »
Can we also dig up Jock McHale? That stuffer has 9 flags up his jumper
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Online Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4853
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #34 on: May 26, 2015, 10:33:42 PM »
Malthouse is a selfish arrogant prick who just loves to be the center of attention.
He would never agree to the demotion of an assistants role and thank Geez for that!

Online Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9826
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #35 on: May 26, 2015, 11:09:57 PM »
It was bad enough he coached the filth to a flag but when he went to the scum cheats he's dead to me.....good riddens & thanks for making them worse than ever.  :clapping
The club that keeps giving.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #36 on: May 26, 2015, 11:22:42 PM »
Lmao.

Caracella and Balmey.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7394
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #37 on: May 27, 2015, 01:47:14 AM »
silly sausage you

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4900
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #38 on: May 27, 2015, 10:39:29 AM »
Won 3 flags in a 3 decade coaching career .

2 of them over 20 years ago when he had a virtual state team at his disposal......should of won another.

Collingwood made the right decision in letting him go - he's a dinosaur and a loose cannon .
Unleash the tornado

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #39 on: May 27, 2015, 10:53:17 AM »
Ricoh said on talkng tigers that he will be at Tigerland
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #40 on: May 27, 2015, 11:53:13 AM »
 :thumbsdown

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8502
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #41 on: May 27, 2015, 12:15:28 PM »
Ricoh said on talkng tigers that he will be at Tigerland

Since when can a printer speak?
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1128
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #42 on: May 27, 2015, 12:21:52 PM »
He has done his job already;
1. Reminded RFC that the list needs a LOT more draft investment before a genuine tilt at the flag (EF 2013)
2. Reminded CFC that they are the most arrogant club devoid of soul in the comp. (lost their mojo)
3. Left CFC as a shell of an organisation with another 500k short.

Offline Zlatan

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #43 on: May 27, 2015, 12:33:07 PM »
Proven To be well and truly past it , if you think that this generation of young punks can relate to someone the age of their grandfather , you'd need your head read. It ain't the 80s no more  :banghead

sir alex ferguson won a few games

Offline Hes My Hero

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 399
Re: Malthouse sacked, we need more assistants, should we get him ?
« Reply #44 on: May 27, 2015, 01:03:34 PM »
I would have to say no to Mick
BUT I would definitely be in Laidley's ear.