Author Topic: should we chase clint bizzell  (Read 1725 times)

letsgetiton!

  • Guest
should we chase clint bizzell
« on: September 23, 2005, 10:57:11 AM »
should we chase biz, melb apparantley wantto trade him and we all know he reads the play well and is a gutsy defender

Offline Razorblade

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 841
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2005, 11:27:54 AM »
His about 30 and is under contract for 2 more years at Melbourne.

He screwed Melbourne over for a 3 year deal last year, when he really didn't deserve it, and now his his 30 with 2 years left on contract and Melburne want to ditch him.

I said it was a bad, bad signing at the time for the Dee's, and one year later i was proved right.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2005, 01:12:07 PM »
Bizell  :lol :lol that's a bod joke isn't it :banghead

Not interested

IMHO we shouldn't look at trading for any player over the age of 25 - if we must pick up an older recycled dude oops I meant dude (I really did) then we should use a late round draft pick
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline tigertough12

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2005, 01:37:07 PM »
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:(

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2005, 03:32:34 PM »
Bizzell turns 30 next year and isn't a key position defender. Too old and not what we need.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

letsgetiton!

  • Guest
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2005, 05:19:01 PM »
Bizzell turns 30 next year and isn't a key position defender. Too old and not what we need.

it was just a thought, .
most said the same thing about graham , and look how his yr turned out. graham wasnt a kpp either but was effective 4 us.
anyway was just a thought as he has carved us up many times

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2005, 06:07:17 PM »
Bizzell turns 30 next year and isn't a key position defender. Too old and not what we need.

it was just a thought, .
most said the same thing about graham , and look how his yr turned out. graham wasnt a kpp either but was effective 4 us.
anyway was just a thought as he has carved us up many times

True about Graham X but he was willing to play for us for peanuts and we practically got him for nothing at pick 65 or whatever it was as he was uncontracted and the Hawks ditched him.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

letsgetiton!

  • Guest
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2005, 06:56:04 PM »
Bizzell turns 30 next year and isn't a key position defender. Too old and not what we need.

it was just a thought, .
most said the same thing about graham , and look how his yr turned out. graham wasnt a kpp either but was effective 4 us.
anyway was just a thought as he has carved us up many times

True about Graham X but he was willing to play for us for peanuts and we practically got him for nothing at pick 65 or whatever it was as he was uncontracted and the Hawks ditched him.

true mt

i spose bizzell can go pusue his acting career or try win over his ex witch

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: should we chase clint bizzell
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2005, 06:59:30 PM »
No
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.