Author Topic: Posting links to sources discussion [Split from 2015 Draft thread]  (Read 1507 times)

Offline Yeahright

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9214
Re: Posting links to sources discussion [Split from 2015 Draft thread]
« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2015, 12:44:47 PM »
Yes, I did see that but I feel as though you don't even endeavour to do that.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 30492
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Posting links to sources discussion [Split from 2015 Draft thread]
« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2015, 01:56:34 PM »
Yes, I did see that but I feel as though you don't even endeavour to do that.

Without being accused of being rude and disrespectful - How would you honestly know?

You don't, you're making an assumption.

But I will add when the same posters constantly refuse to post the links then the time they get to fix it themselves (as well as the time we take looking) is far less than what others get (quite rightly I would argue). We shouldn't have to make the same request to the same people every week or in some cases every day...

"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3497
  • The busier you get, the slower you walk
Re: Posting links to sources discussion [Split from 2015 Draft thread]
« Reply #17 on: August 28, 2015, 02:19:34 PM »
Yes, I did see that but I feel as though you don't even endeavour to do that.

Without being accused of being rude and disrespectful - How would you honestly know?

You don't, you're making an assumption.

But I will add when the same posters constantly refuse to post the links then the time they get to fix it themselves (as well as the time we take looking) is far less than what others get (quite rightly I would argue). We shouldn't have to make the same request to the same people every week or in some cases every day...

Might be easier to remove the sentence "If we are unable to do that OER will endeavour to find the source and edit the post." from the rule.

 :cheers

Offline ())(

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8373
  • Dimalaka
Re: Posting links to sources discussion [Split from 2015 Draft thread]
« Reply #18 on: August 28, 2015, 02:27:57 PM »
One of two things need to happen.

1-Admin relax and stop worrying about being sued.(it ain't gonna happen)

2- Posters abide by admins requests on the grounds that they do a great job overall (even though they are a little intimidated by silly laws that nobody would enforce.  ;D)
I cant believe it, 1.20 to go, youre three points up and there is nobody at the back end of the square for a quick kick in for the opposition.

I just cant believe my eyes.

Its poor leadership and its poor coaching from the Richmond Football Club.

Offline Yeahright

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9214
Re: Posting links to sources discussion [Split from 2015 Draft thread]
« Reply #19 on: August 28, 2015, 03:29:44 PM »
Yes, I did see that but I feel as though you don't even endeavour to do that.

Without being accused of being rude and disrespectful - How would you honestly know?

You don't, you're making an assumption.

But I will add when the same posters constantly refuse to post the links then the time they get to fix it themselves (as well as the time we take looking) is far less than what others get (quite rightly I would argue). We shouldn't have to make the same request to the same people every week or in some cases every day...

I definitely should have posted sometimes, but yes it is just an assumption but it was based on a couple of specific circumstances.