Author Topic: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or Key Back / #RookieDraft  (Read 23898 times)

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13303
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #15 on: October 07, 2015, 05:40:46 PM »
Why aren't we looking at:

Bugg
Townsend
Redden

Carlisle
Henderson
Tomlinson
Talia

Leuenberger
Redden
Smith

Honestly I'd even go so far as to throw the whole kitchen at Hogan. Tell him $1million/year for 8 years or something stupid.

How do you know we arent

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19392
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #16 on: October 07, 2015, 05:41:57 PM »
Because we're locked, loaded and cherry ripe!
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9940
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2015, 05:53:11 PM »
Why aren't we looking at:

Bugg
Townsend
Redden

Carlisle
Henderson
Tomlinson
Talia

Leuenberger
Redden
Smith

Honestly I'd even go so far as to throw the whole kitchen at Hogan. Tell him $1million/year for 8 years or something stupid.

How do you know we arent

I don't, but these are mostly high profile players and it's not often they get traded without any information leaking beforehand.

Do you have any knowledge to the contrary?

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #18 on: October 07, 2015, 06:00:50 PM »
Why aren't we looking at:

Bugg
Townsend
Redden

Carlisle
Henderson
Tomlinson
Talia

Leuenberger
Redden
Smith

Honestly I'd even go so far as to throw the whole kitchen at Hogan. Tell him $1million/year for 8 years or something stupid.

How do you know we arent

I don't, but these are mostly high profile players and it's not often they get traded without any information leaking beforehand.

Do you have any knowledge to the contrary?

from what I heard today

Bugg to Melbourne
Carlisle to Saints
Henderson to Cats
Tomlinson to Blues
Luenberger to Essendon

and...
Sinclair to swans for Jetta
also Craig Bird to be traded from swans to ??
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19392
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2015, 06:20:15 PM »
..and Redden to West Coast...Smith to Geelong...
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #20 on: October 07, 2015, 06:30:58 PM »
No point crying over things...we tried for treloar,Bennel,Hannebury..and we missed out for whatever reason..
Maybe for a second straight season we go to the draft and a few seasons down the track we have a smorgasboard of guns.
But then again trade week hasnt even started yet

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9940
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #21 on: October 07, 2015, 06:49:49 PM »
We also failed on Tyson, Armitage, Shiel.

Have to wonder what the issue is...

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2015, 07:13:14 PM »
Cause sir Alex Dimma and friends

Rate Hampson and Chaplin really

Really highly ??
how did our backline perform this year, all BS and bluster aside  ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Online JP Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1557
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #23 on: October 07, 2015, 07:46:57 PM »
We also failed on Tyson, Armitage, Shiel.

Have to wonder what the issue is...
Nobody on this site knows all of the details involved in these trades or non-trades.  :P

Anybody with access to all of the relevant facts wouldn't dare post it in here anyway ...   :shh
Once a Tiger, always a Tiger!  Loud, proud & dangerous!

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #24 on: October 07, 2015, 08:51:05 PM »
Cause sir Alex Dimma and friends

Rate Hampson and Chaplin really

Really highly ??
how did our backline perform this year, all BS and bluster aside  ::)

Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #25 on: October 08, 2015, 03:55:40 PM »
Is trade week over ?

looks a bit that way  :clapping

AFL 24/7
‏@AFLTrade
Richmond are officially out of the race for GWS' Adam Treloar.. St Kilda now slowly entering the race. #AFL #AFLTrade

https://twitter.com/AFLTrade/status/651963899185491968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw


Harley Bennell could announce that Fremantle as his club of choice as early as today.

Bennell is being offered a 3 year deal from the Dockers.

https://twitter.com/traderadio
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19392
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #26 on: October 08, 2015, 04:51:23 PM »
 HARTLEY! :clapping :bow :clapping :gotigers
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #27 on: October 09, 2015, 10:26:14 PM »

Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender

Cause sir Alex Dimma and friends

Rate Hampson and Chaplin really

Really highly ??



 :facepalm


“We have two needs that we have identified

— one a rebounding defender, which is hopefully (Carlton’s) Chris Yarran,

 and the other is an inside midfielder,” Tigers football boss Dan Richardson said on Friday.


“Ideally we would have liked to have got an elite mid like (Adam) Treloar, but that’s not going to happen.

 “You never say never, but the reality is we’ve been connected to everyone. Some of it’s true and some of it’s not. If we can bring those two players in we’ll be quite happy.”

http://www.themercury.com.au/afl-trades-2015-richmond-shows-interest-in-gws-midfielder-jacob-townsend/story-fnj3twbb-1227563687972


 :facepalm
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98023
    • One-Eyed Richmond
The Tigers are not in the market for a ruckman and will back Ivan Maric and Shaun Hampson for another season.

“It’s probably something we’ve got to address over the next 12 to 18 months, but at this stage Ivan is obviously still our No.1 ruckman,” Tigers' boss Dan Richardson said.

“We brought Shaun in a couple of years ago to be that taller option. He’s had some injury and (issues with) durability, but he’s also showed signs here of improving. We need to back that in.”

http://www.themercury.com.au/afl-trades-2015-richmond-shows-interest-in-gws-midfielder-jacob-townsend/story-fnj3twbb-1227563687972

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #29 on: October 09, 2015, 10:34:18 PM »
 
The Tigers are not in the market for a ruckman and will back Ivan Maric and Shaun Hampson for another season.

“It’s probably something we’ve got to address over the next 12 to 18 months, but at this stage Ivan is obviously still our No.1 ruckman,” Tigers' boss Dan Richardson said.

“We brought Shaun in a couple of years ago to be that taller option. He’s had some injury and (issues with) durability, but he’s also showed signs here of improving. We need to back that in.”

http://www.themercury.com.au/afl-trades-2015-richmond-shows-interest-in-gws-midfielder-jacob-townsend/story-fnj3twbb-1227563687972

woooow, you couldnt make it up if you tried ...

:rollin :rollin :rollin
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus