Author Topic: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or Key Back / #RookieDraft  (Read 23900 times)

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Cause sir Alex Dimma and friends

Rate Hampson and Chaplin really

Really highly ??
« Last Edit: November 25, 2015, 01:54:16 PM by Stalin »
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5100
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2015, 01:13:48 PM »
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4801
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2015, 01:14:26 PM »
Is trade week over ?
Unleash the tornado

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2015, 01:16:08 PM »
Is trade week over ?
Accrding to many on here yes!
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2015, 01:18:57 PM »
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?

Oh thank god

Which ones?
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2015, 01:22:57 PM »
Is trade week over ?

'Apparently'

 ;)
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40263
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2015, 01:41:48 PM »
Is trade week over ?
Accrding to many on here yes!

Knew if I had a couple of drinks last night I'd miss something
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13303
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2015, 01:44:02 PM »
Also why arent we looking at a swingman

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2015, 02:02:12 PM »
Also why arent we looking at a swingman
At this point I'd be happy with a swagman!!
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5100
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2015, 02:03:22 PM »
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?

Oh thank god

Which ones?

tall ones, I hope.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2015, 02:34:27 PM »
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?

Oh thank god

Which ones?

tall ones, I hope.
:lol
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2015, 02:45:24 PM »
#bigfishorbust  :shh

  :lol
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8074
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2015, 04:48:23 PM »
Also why arent we looking at a swingman

I'd be happy with a swinger
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2015, 04:51:04 PM »
No need for that, back on topic please.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9940
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2015, 05:39:29 PM »
Why aren't we looking at:

Bugg
Townsend
Redden
Suckling

Carlisle
Henderson
Tomlinson
Talia
Schoenmakers

Leuenberger
Redden
Smith

Honestly I'd even go so far as to throw the whole kitchen at Hogan. Tell him $1million/year for 8 years or something stupid.