« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or Key Back / #RookieDraft  (Read 24046 times)

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or Key Back / #RookieDraft
« on: October 07, 2015, 01:09:09 PM »
Cause sir Alex Dimma and friends

Rate Hampson and Chaplin really

Really highly ??
« Last Edit: November 25, 2015, 01:54:16 PM by Stalin »
Logged
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2015, 01:13:48 PM »
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?
Logged

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4802
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2015, 01:14:26 PM »
Is trade week over ?
Logged
Unleash the tornado

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2015, 01:16:08 PM »
Quote from: mat073 on October 07, 2015, 01:14:26 PM
Is trade week over ?
Accrding to many on here yes!
Logged
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2015, 01:18:57 PM »
Quote from: Willy on October 07, 2015, 01:13:48 PM
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?

Oh thank god

Which ones?
Logged
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2015, 01:22:57 PM »
Quote from: mat073 on October 07, 2015, 01:14:26 PM
Is trade week over ?

'Apparently'

 ;)
Logged
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40310
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2015, 01:41:48 PM »
Quote from: YellowandBlackBlood on October 07, 2015, 01:16:08 PM
Quote from: mat073 on October 07, 2015, 01:14:26 PM
Is trade week over ?
Accrding to many on here yes!

Knew if I had a couple of drinks last night I'd miss something
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2015, 01:44:02 PM »
Also why arent we looking at a swingman
Logged

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2015, 02:02:12 PM »
Quote from: Chuck17 on October 07, 2015, 01:44:02 PM
Also why arent we looking at a swingman
At this point I'd be happy with a swagman!!
Logged
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2015, 02:03:22 PM »
Quote from: Stalin on October 07, 2015, 01:18:57 PM
Quote from: Willy on October 07, 2015, 01:13:48 PM
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?

Oh thank god

Which ones?

tall ones, I hope.
Logged

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2015, 02:34:27 PM »
Quote from: Willy on October 07, 2015, 02:03:22 PM
Quote from: Stalin on October 07, 2015, 01:18:57 PM
Quote from: Willy on October 07, 2015, 01:13:48 PM
I've heard various reports that we are looking for a ruckman?

Oh thank god

Which ones?

tall ones, I hope.
:lol
Logged
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2015, 02:45:24 PM »
#bigfishorbust  :shh

  :lol
Logged
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8094
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2015, 04:48:23 PM »
Quote from: Chuck17 on October 07, 2015, 01:44:02 PM
Also why arent we looking at a swingman

I'd be happy with a swinger
Logged
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2015, 04:51:04 PM »
No need for that, back on topic please.
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9972
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2015, 05:39:29 PM »
Why aren't we looking at:

Bugg
Townsend
Redden
Suckling

Carlisle
Henderson
Tomlinson
Talia
Schoenmakers

Leuenberger
Redden
Smith

Honestly I'd even go so far as to throw the whole kitchen at Hogan. Tell him $1million/year for 8 years or something stupid.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7   Go Up
« previous next »