Author Topic: Official team round 6 vs Port  (Read 12927 times)

Offline Heart of Darkness

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #30 on: April 28, 2016, 07:26:51 PM »
Great to see TWO ruckman playing
Will allow Vickery to play permanent forward
Tiges by 5 goals
No. One ruckman and one guy who can tap the ball and do nothing else useful around the ground. So unless he runs off after the tap, we are one man down effectively when he is on the field.


Hampson form was solid
Hope he kicks 4 goals this week to stick it up a few of the posters here
Has he ever kicked 4 goals in his life?
I think he has kicked 3 against a GWS side that was full of 18 year olds in 2012.

I think you are grasping at straws now Jack.

Reckon he just might this week
Wait and see

Can't see the ball accidentally hitting his foot 4 times in close vicinity to the goal line unfortunately

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7359
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #31 on: April 28, 2016, 07:27:40 PM »
Great to see TWO ruckman playing
Will allow Vickery to play permanent forward
Tiges by 5 goals
No. One ruckman and one guy who can tap the ball and do nothing else useful around the ground. So unless he runs off after the tap, we are one man down effectively when he is on the field.


Hampson form was solid
Hope he kicks 4 goals this week to stick it up a few of the posters here
Has he ever kicked 4 goals in his life?
I think he has kicked 3 against a GWS side that was full of 18 year olds in 2012.

I think you are grasping at straws now Jack.

Reckon he just might this week
Wait and see
Will have to take 4 marks on the goal line to have any chance

Jackstar 1960

  • Guest
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #32 on: April 28, 2016, 07:28:44 PM »
Have to play 2 ruckman
Been a huge issue all year that when Vickery goes into the ruck to relieve
Forward set up is shot
Playing two ruckman allow for Vickery to be a permanent forward
Happy Days

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #33 on: April 28, 2016, 07:37:47 PM »
Have to play 2 ruckman
Been a huge issue all year that when Vickery goes into the ruck to relieve
Forward set up is shot
Playing two ruckman allow for Vickery to be a permanent forward
Happy Days
Have you been drinking Jack?
Hasn't Maric only played one game?
The reason we have been poo is because we haven't had a decent ruckman in the side until last week.
Hampson is so bad its embassing watching him in a Tigers jumper.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #34 on: April 28, 2016, 07:51:20 PM »
Its a laugh a minute at tigerland. Thursday night selections at rfc  ITS GOLDEN.How could people be angry with these selections or non selections, it is the biggest laugh of the week long live dimma lol.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3812
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #35 on: April 28, 2016, 07:57:25 PM »
Taylor, Oleg Markov and Jason Castagna are our emergencies. What if Jack doesn't play?

thats easy, Hunt
sad but true.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #36 on: April 28, 2016, 08:01:14 PM »
Hampson must have trained really well

Apparently trained the house down.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #37 on: April 28, 2016, 08:02:43 PM »
Have to play 2 ruckman
Been a huge issue all year that when Vickery goes into the ruck to relieve
Forward set up is shot
Playing two ruckman allow for Vickery to be a permanent forward
Happy Days
Have you been huffing?
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #38 on: April 28, 2016, 08:10:59 PM »
Great to see TWO ruckman playing
Will allow Vickery to play permanent forward
Tiges by 5 goals
No. One ruckman and one guy who can tap the ball and do nothing else useful around the ground. So unless he runs off after the tap, we are one man down effectively when he is on the field.

Hampson form was solid
Hope he kicks 4 goals this week to stick it up a few of the posters here
turn it up

the spud cant kick one through from 15 directly in front and now hes going to kick 4?

Jackstar 1960

  • Guest
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #39 on: April 28, 2016, 08:12:19 PM »
I am tipping he will kick 4 on Saturday Night

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40334
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #40 on: April 28, 2016, 08:12:41 PM »
Hope he kicks 4 goals this week to stick it up a few of the posters here

I'd settle for 4 kicks hitting a target

Actually I'd settle simply for 4 kicks  :rollin
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #41 on: April 28, 2016, 08:20:01 PM »
Have to play 2 ruckman
Been a huge issue all year that when Vickery goes into the ruck to relieve
Forward set up is shot
Playing two ruckman allow for Vickery to be a permanent forward
Happy Days
Have you been drinking Jack?
Hasn't Maric only played one game?
The reason we have been poo is because we haven't had a decent ruckman in the side until last week.
Hampson is so bad its embassing watching him in a Tigers jumper.
Gotta say big Maxy Gawn towelled poor old ivan up big time, not many have criticised ivans game though.  Yes he had a crack but it doesnt help anyone when it costs so much.
Gonna say straight up i dont think Hampson should be getting a game either but ffs his last two with the usual weaknessess was pretty decent.
Also agree we only need one ruckman this week Maric or Hampson who gives a toss.
What a lost opportunity to get a game into both McBean and Chol  There will be no Trengrove or Carlisle  a perfect opportunity to stretch the bastards in the air. If Riewoldt and Vickery dont kick a bag each they ought to give it away.

Two struggling sides who wont make the 8 it was a perfect opportunity to play a lot of kids against a struggling injury riddled opponent with the future in mind. But nope ypou know what we can make finals  mathmatically to hell with development.
It used to pee me off no end now days i just chuckle to myself


Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2875
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #42 on: April 28, 2016, 08:36:13 PM »
I don't think there is any shortage of people calling out Ivan in the sense that his body is cooked and can't compete with ruckman in the top 8. He does try his heart out and he does provide leadership but his leap is pretty much stuffed and his mobility is gone also. Also Max Gawn managed to beat Goldstein in hit outs when they met so we all knew Maric in his first game back was going to get pantsed.

I personally would've given Todd Elton a go as a like for like fill in for Rance.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #43 on: April 28, 2016, 08:37:29 PM »
Morris and Batch again..... :rollin
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #44 on: April 28, 2016, 08:55:06 PM »
Morris and Batch again..... :rollin
Great aint it. No gray wingard or even white and they will both still make the keystone cops look serious.Gotta love the battlers eh always good for a bit of light relief.