No get out clause; Richmond up for big pay out if Hardwick is sacked (H-Sun)

[WilliamPowell]

]
Well WP, you tried to tell me the club wouldnt be stupid enough to not have a get our clause a couple of months ago and would 'back it in'. Called me naive too IIRC.

I told you the club would be stupid enough. This was met with much disdain, and further, would appear to have formed part of your basis to criticise my disproportionate amount of negative posts.

Perhaps a lesson in keeping ones mind

So just i am clear you are saying that Jon Raplh is correct without question and Patrick Smith is categorically wrong?

Really?

I dont think either joirno has a clue TBBH.

Just like we dont.

All employement contracts have some sort of out clause, it's general business practice. What the clause is and what it entails I have no idea, just like Ralph, Smith and you Dooks dont

So pehaps we all should keep an open mind on it

[Chuck17]

I know 

[Stalin]

WGAF it's just money

Sack the bum

[YellowandBlackBlood]

WGAF it's just money

Sack the bum

I thought the problem is the payout goes into our football department expenditure which the AFL want to cap. That means we may be disadvantaged in the future by having to pay less than other clubs on their footy departments.

[🏅Dooks]

]
Well WP, you tried to tell me the club wouldnt be stupid enough to not have a get our clause a couple of months ago and would 'back it in'. Called me naive too IIRC.

I told you the club would be stupid enough. This was met with much disdain, and further, would appear to have formed part of your basis to criticise my disproportionate amount of negative posts.

Perhaps a lesson in keeping ones mind

So just i am clear you are saying that Jon Raplh is correct without question and Patrick Smith is categorically wrong?

Really?

I dont think either joirno has a clue TBBH.

Just like we dont.

All employement contracts have some sort of out clause, it's general business practice. What the clause is and what it entails I have no idea, just like Ralph, Smith and you Dooks dont

So pehaps we all should keep an open mind on it

All im saying is the club is so incompetant its definately a strong possibility. Even a likelihood. Look at the poo decisions they have made. More of the same. The article supports this.

Yes we should keep an open mind. No more "naive" comments.

[Stalin]

WGAF it's just money

Sack the bum

I thought the problem is the payout goes into our football department expenditure which the AFL want to cap. That means we may be disadvantaged in the future by having to pay less than other clubs on their footy departments.

Past
Present
Future

Not the same

They cant retrospectively punish RFC. Ask WPs legal eagle

[Diocletian]

WGAF it's just money

Sack the bum

I thought the problem is the payout goes into our football department expenditure which the AFL want to cap. That means we may be disadvantaged in the future by having to pay less than other clubs on their footy departments.

Don't we just have to pay a "luxury tax" that's then redistributed to minnow clubs like North & Footscray?

[Go Richo 12]

I know 

Rebuild clause

[georgies31]

Gary March I give him credit had bals to make hard decsions ala Miller and Wallace our board if this is true has sold the club out and it'smembers.