Author Topic: Should Richmond get Cloke?  (Read 2639 times)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Should Richmond get Cloke?
« on: May 21, 2016, 10:23:55 AM »
Pros - he wouldnt cost us picks
Cons - he is Travis Cloke.
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2016, 10:59:31 AM »
Cons: Julie Cloke
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5295
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2016, 11:06:19 AM »
We need a new whipping boy to take over from Vickery.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2016, 12:26:47 PM »
Pro:  he is not troy Chaplin
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2016, 12:28:27 PM »
Got a pairs of the best hands in the league.  Very strong. Very Mobile.  :sarcasm Could lose you a Grand Final  ;D After seeing him miss a goal inside the 10 metre square just the other week.  :razz

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4653
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2016, 01:46:53 PM »
Don't want Cloke .

Play Chol or Mcbean FFS.
Unleash the tornado

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4653
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2016, 02:05:26 PM »
While we're at it ....dont want that frizzy haired girl Mayne either  !!!!! !
Unleash the tornado

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2016, 02:57:24 PM »
Part of me says yeah because it would structure our forward line well. Other part of me says hell no because it clearly doesn't work for Collingwood and the bloke is captain potato. 

Offline Heart of Darkness

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2016, 03:01:47 PM »
Part of me says yeah because it would structure our forward line well. Other part of me says hell no because it clearly doesn't work for Collingwood and the bloke is captain potato.

I'd rather him than Vickery. Think structurally/ game plan wise he (when up and about) is exactly what our forward line is missing.

Online Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9376
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2016, 03:31:24 PM »
NO!

The Cloke family can get stuffed! The old man deserted us for the filth and when the boys had a choice to make they chose the filth again.

Get lost! 
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2016, 04:42:52 PM »
 :lol
Its a bit late for that.
you do know that David came back and finished his career at richmond?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2016, 05:48:41 PM »
NO!

The Cloke family can get stuffed! The old man deserted us for the filth and when the boys had a choice to make they chose the filth again.

Get lost!

x2
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5004
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2016, 05:49:42 PM »
If we did get him I'd play him at CHB.

It's really just his goal kicking that is killing him as a player. His field kicking is fine and he has a decent tank.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2016, 06:23:33 PM »
If we did get him I'd play him at CHB.

It's really just his goal kicking that is killing him as a player. His field kicking is fine and he has a decent tank.

Pro:  he is not troy Chaplin
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Should Richmond get Cloke?
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2016, 06:35:49 PM »
Effin lol. Can only guess who picked yes