Author Topic: Question Time  (Read 2162 times)

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3747
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Question Time
« on: June 05, 2016, 05:11:26 AM »
Identification and breakdown of processes at RFC

For example,
1. Medical due diligence when drafting a new player
2. Psychological profile and due diligence when drafting a new player
3. KPI, targets and expectations outlined to player pre and post draft and ongoing individual KPI review
4. Management and counseling of players once drafted, RE regarding physical and mental conditioning
5. Group management, targets and expectations
6. Support staff review including,
A) a full and detailed list management team review/goals/expectations/targets
b) Coach and coaching panel review, targets and expectations
c) Selection panel, process and effectiveness
7. Player opinions regarding all of the above.
8. External review, how is RFC perceived by outside players.

I am unsure if RFC have any systems in place after watching some of our performances and looking at our overall drive and determination.

It is obvious something is broken at RFC and whatever it is needs to be identified and corrected.

Any comments on our processes above "those in the know"?

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Question Time
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2016, 06:40:30 AM »
I'm sure that they have most of those things in place - it's what action you take with the information provided which is important.
I'd also add the club appears to struggle making key decisions to effect change AHEAD of the curve.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3747
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Question Time
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2016, 10:04:22 AM »
I'm sure that they have most of those things in place - it's what action you take with the information provided which is important.
I'd also add the club appears to struggle making key decisions to effect change AHEAD of the curve.
Thanks for that, amazing to think that we would have had Chris Yarran complete a psychological examination and still recruit him.(not a negative against Chris , I hope he defeats his issues and does play for us), more a comment on our systems

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Question Time
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2016, 02:29:19 PM »
Multi-Million dollar enterprise has everything in place

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Question Time
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2016, 02:30:30 PM »
Multi-Million dollar enterprise has everything in place
Including stability…..
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Question Time
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2016, 02:32:09 PM »
Our stability is stable....and smells like one too.....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Question Time
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2016, 02:36:02 PM »
Multi-Million dollar enterprise has everything in place
Including stability…..

The club is still operating on a profit. That is Stability  :snidegrin

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Question Time
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2016, 02:37:02 PM »
Nothing else matters after the corporate  :santa

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Question Time
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2016, 03:06:04 PM »
Identification and breakdown of processes at RFC

For example,
1. Medical due diligence when drafting a new player
2. Psychological profile and due diligence when drafting a new player
3. KPI, targets and expectations outlined to player pre and post draft and ongoing individual KPI review
4. Management and counseling of players once drafted, RE regarding physical and mental conditioning
5. Group management, targets and expectations
6. Support staff review including,
A) a full and detailed list management team review/goals/expectations/targets
b) Coach and coaching panel review, targets and expectations
c) Selection panel, process and effectiveness
7. Player opinions regarding all of the above.
8. External review, how is RFC perceived by outside players.

I am unsure if RFC have any systems in place after watching some of our performances and looking at our overall drive and determination.

It is obvious something is broken at RFC and whatever it is needs to be identified and corrected.

Any comments on our processes above "those in the know"?

Do we get ticks for Trengrove and for Martin in this regard?

Can you elaborate on your reference to "due diligence" in your second point. Strikes me a buzz phrasing without much meaning? Due diligence in reality has a meaning closer related to something along the lines of making sure you've done at least the bare minimum expected of your job.

Point 5 seems trivial.

Point 6 reiterates point 4.



Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Question Time
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2016, 04:10:42 PM »
Reality of our process in recruiting.






Nothing but the best quality equipment at Tigerland.  :rollin
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Question Time
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2016, 05:02:07 PM »
Only the best processes in training.

The club that keeps giving.

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Question Time
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2016, 05:19:37 PM »
I'm sure that they have most of those things in place - it's what action you take with the information provided which is important.
I'd also add the club appears to struggle making key decisions to effect change AHEAD of the curve.
Thanks for that, amazing to think that we would have had Chris Yarran complete a psychological examination and still recruit him.(not a negative against Chris , I hope he defeats his issues and does play for us), more a comment on our systems
A psychological examination won't help in the assessment of a depressed mood if the target does not answer accurately. Most screening tools are simple questions where you rate the prevalence of symptoms on a scale of 0-3. GP's generally only do a 10 question tool whilst mental health professionals may use a 21 question screening tool and both are only used to record the previous two weeks.

 

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Question Time
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2016, 05:25:12 PM »
Only the best processes in training.



Ah yes, the famous Gantry of Greatness....preparing our players for the savage pillow fights that always break out during the end of year slumber party at Dimma's place.....

...btw - have Hackson & Mike Sheehan ever been seen in the same room together? :shh
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 05:42:08 PM by Diocletian »
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3747
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Question Time
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2016, 06:16:08 PM »
Identification and breakdown of processes at RFC

For example,
1. Medical due diligence when drafting a new player
2. Psychological profile and due diligence when drafting a new player
3. KPI, targets and expectations outlined to player pre and post draft and ongoing individual KPI review
4. Management and counseling of players once drafted, RE regarding physical and mental conditioning
5. Group management, targets and expectations
6. Support staff review including,
A) a full and detailed list management team review/goals/expectations/targets
b) Coach and coaching panel review, targets and expectations
c) Selection panel, process and effectiveness
7. Player opinions regarding all of the above.
8. External review, how is RFC perceived by outside players.

I am unsure if RFC have any systems in place after watching some of our performances and looking at our overall drive and determination.

It is obvious something is broken at RFC and whatever it is needs to be identified and corrected.

Any comments on our processes above "those in the know"?

Do we get ticks for Trengrove and for Martin in this regard?

Can you elaborate on your reference to "due diligence" in your second point. Strikes me a buzz phrasing without much meaning? Due diligence in reality has a meaning closer related to something along the lines of making sure you've done at least the bare minimum expected of your job.

Point 5 seems trivial.

Point 6 reiterates point 4.
Thanks
Point 4 relates to individual players
Point 6 relates to the coaching and management team
Point 5 relates to the effectiveness of players as a group

We did a great job with Martin and Trengove
Due diligence means taking proper care and consideration relating to these issues

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Question Time
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2016, 10:10:24 PM »
Identification and breakdown of processes at RFC

For example,
1. Medical due diligence when drafting a new player
2. Psychological profile and due diligence when drafting a new player
3. KPI, targets and expectations outlined to player pre and post draft and ongoing individual KPI review
4. Management and counseling of players once drafted, RE regarding physical and mental conditioning
5. Group management, targets and expectations
6. Support staff review including,
A) a full and detailed list management team review/goals/expectations/targets
b) Coach and coaching panel review, targets and expectations
c) Selection panel, process and effectiveness
7. Player opinions regarding all of the above.
8. External review, how is RFC perceived by outside players.

I am unsure if RFC have any systems in place after watching some of our performances and looking at our overall drive and determination.

It is obvious something is broken at RFC and whatever it is needs to be identified and corrected.

Any comments on our processes above "those in the know"?

Do we get ticks for Trengrove and for Martin in this regard?

Can you elaborate on your reference to "due diligence" in your second point. Strikes me a buzz phrasing without much meaning? Due diligence in reality has a meaning closer related to something along the lines of making sure you've done at least the bare minimum expected of your job.

Point 5 seems trivial.

Point 6 reiterates point 4.

Point 6 is about staff, point 4 is about players bro