Our new "Rudi Webster"?

[🏅Dooks]

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-07-19/improvements-all-in-the-mind-for-key-tigers

Hopefully Emma can create miracles. Good luck to her as she is seemingly doing a great job.

 

Considering more players are down on form this year than previous years, is she really doing a great job?

We don't know who she has spoken to in the team. In some respects the form of players has been ok - the game plan has been poor or at least unable to be carried out.

She's employed by the club for all the players. If she has only spoke to a handful then she's failed and it's pointless having her on the books. If she spoken to most, she has failed on the basis of most players form going backwards.

Can't have it both ways, and can't have it one way and claim success without very selectively introducing other factors which muddy the waters.

It's purely up to the individual whether they see her or not and even then it's unlikely she would be on salary. She would only be paid for each client she sees.

You don't know that. But ok, so if she's 2 from 2 (Hampson and Martin) which would be highly unlikely, why wouldn't the club be making this mandatory?

[YellowandBlackBlood]

I guess this means nobody knows her work description and contract.

Maybe WP has more information.

[Chuck17]

Emma is the Mum of the teenage boy who broke his neck and was left a quadriplegic back in Jan or Feb.
 
For memory it was from jumping of a pier into shallow water but stand corrected

She is one of guests at next Monday nigh at the very special "Strong and Bold" function where the main guest is Turia Pitt who is simply an inspirational person

So clearly she doesn't get her message across initially.

Extremely poor taste Ox

I'll leave it at that

We all just thought he was your 'touched' son and had to make concessions 

LMAO

[Go Richo 12]

 

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-07-19/improvements-all-in-the-mind-for-key-tigers

Hopefully Emma can create miracles. Good luck to her as she is seemingly doing a great job.

 

Considering more players are down on form this year than previous years, is she really doing a great job?

We don't know who she has spoken to in the team. In some respects the form of players has been ok - the game plan has been poor or at least unable to be carried out.

She's employed by the club for all the players. If she has only spoke to a handful then she's failed and it's pointless having her on the books. If she spoken to most, she has failed on the basis of most players form going backwards.

Can't have it both ways, and can't have it one way and claim success without very selectively introducing other factors which muddy the waters.

It's purely up to the individual whether they see her or not and even then it's unlikely she would be on salary. She would only be paid for each client she sees.

You don't know that. But ok, so if she's 2 from 2 (Hampson and Martin) which would be highly unlikely, why wouldn't the club be making this mandatory?

No i don't know it for certain but i am certainly familiar with how some if these arrangements are structured.