Hammer & Sammy re-sign for 2 years each

[Simonator]

Here's a question. If we didn't sign Hampson who is our ruck ? We rely on getting a competitive ruck over the off season ? Good signin imo. Should be looking for someone better but he is a good back up

[pmac21]

Hammer's signing represents everything this club has done wrong for 30+ years. 
One year deal, fine.  Gives a chance to bring in another ruckman. Two years is a joke.  It really is. 
I admit he's been solid this year but he's been on a list for 10 years and had 2 OK one's??
I dunno, maybe they don't see a trade for one this year?? Who know's but year to year for Hammer would have been the way to go IMO.

[Hard Roar Tiger]

Hammer's signing represents everything this club has done wrong for 30+ years. 
One year deal, fine.  Gives a chance to bring in another ruckman. Two years is a joke.  It really is. 
I admit he's been solid this year but he's been on a list for 10 years and had 2 OK one's??
I dunno, maybe they don't see a trade for one this year?? Who know's but year to year for Hammer would have been the way to go IMO.

This. Club is in danger of making a bad season even worse.

[(•))(©™]

Lloyd sure.

Hampson just shows how moronic and in denial these so called club leaders are.
2 years. Lol.
I love NOT supporting these losers.

[mat073]

To give Hammer two more years is an endorsement by the club that he will be the number one ruck.

Somehow I don't expect the tiger faithful to be happy with this decision.

[Harry]

Don't have to worry about finding a ruck now. 

[Stalin]

Locked & loaded

[Harry]

One less thing Blair has to think about

[Jackstar 1960]

Congrats to both players
Deserved the contracts offered
Well done Hammer and Sam I say
🔨⏱ and 👌

[Diocletian]

Congratulations to all opposition coaches who will now be able to select an extra mid against us for the next two years.....

Review? What review? 

[Chuck17]

Why are we the only club that has to play a man down every week for the next two years

[big tone]

The smart play would have been a 1 year contract for Hampson.
Absolutely no need for 2 years.
Was he going somewhere??

Sound familiar??

[Willy]

The smart play would have been a 1 year contract for Hampson.
Absolutely no need for 2 years.
Was he going somewhere??

Rival clubs were circling. Balwyn offered him big money, for example.

[(•))(©™]

The smart play would have been a 1 year contract for Hampson.
Absolutely no need for 2 years.
Was he going somewhere??

Rival clubs were circling. Balwyn offered him big money, for example.

 

[the claw]

A decision of little choice in regards to Hampson, no doubt Maric will retire and beyond that we only have project players in reserve.

Lloyd hasnt done too much wrong so deserves another couple of seasons. Is a regular contributor and seems a very driven type character who will do what it takes to become a better player.

So why two years with both. Both are battlers and i reckon a smart recruiter would be able to replace both fairly cheaply.
1 year for both, as others have said the other options are non existent and both would be decent depth if we managed to cover the areas in trades or even nd.
Last time i looked depth players get one yr deals and they play out of their skins to get a gig.