Author Topic: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)  (Read 2801 times)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2016, 09:30:53 AM »
Hawthorn must need backline depth. Covert Dunstall
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Shammo80

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2016, 12:27:48 PM »
yep dunstall sniffing for the hawks as there backline get that little bit older... Please if we traded or even thought of getting rid of rance the club would be ratshit he is our main player fancy a backline with out rance never

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2016, 01:39:05 PM »
Another very poor story from media trying to damage the RFC.
These articles are clearly written to cause the club grief & nothing more. Just to try keep the club down the bottom.
l reckon 2017 will be a good year

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2016, 12:05:42 PM »
28 next year, We are not supporting an NGO! It is a horribly under-achieving football club! Any half decent recruitment plan would include offloading Rance for the highest picks we could get, possibly several 1st rounders

Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2016, 01:29:11 PM »
28 next year, We are not supporting an NGO! It is a horribly under-achieving football club! Any half decent recruitment plan would include offloading Rance for the highest picks we could get, possibly several 1st rounders

You've lost the plot. Rance is one of 3-4 untouchables!

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2016, 01:41:06 PM »
Another very poor story from media trying to damage the RFC.
These articles are clearly written to cause the club grief & nothing more. Just to try keep the club down the bottom.
l reckon 2017 will be a good year

Mate,
Nobody could damage the club like the club itself.
Get over that one
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Beans

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2016, 01:42:28 PM »
28 next year, We are not supporting an NGO! It is a horribly under-achieving football club! Any half decent recruitment plan would include offloading Rance for the highest picks we could get, possibly several 1st rounders
So tell me how trading out the best backman in the league, and at Richmond in the last 30 years will improve our club? With our drafting record of about a 20% strike rate we could get six picks and still only get one half decent player. I know. Why don't we trade everyone out and start again?  :help

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Rance Shouldn't Be Discounted From Trade Talk: Dunstall (MMM)
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2016, 01:53:57 PM »
28 next year, We are not supporting an NGO! It is a horribly under-achieving football club! Any half decent recruitment plan would include offloading Rance for the highest picks we could get, possibly several 1st rounders
my lawyers are looking into this blatant plagiarism!

Ironically, I think we should keep Rance and Jack (culture warriors) but everyone else can go at the right price.