I said this 3 months ago, we should have headhunted the best recruiters then, now we have to put up with rubbish again.
IMO all contracts should be up for review under Balmes guidance.
Pay them out, pee them off.
I would expect a recruiter to have to go through an application process as stringent as an AFL coach.
They would more then likely need to make a presentation on their views of our current list, evaluation of all players and a recommendation plan as a way forward.
Did M Clarke have to do this?
Not saying its a total contradiction to "headhunt the best recruiters" whilst at the same time have a prospective headhunter "go through an application process" but I certainly can't fathom the notion that the best recruiters are just waiting in the wings for the RFC call-up.
C'mon guys, can we be a little bit smart about what we want?
3 months ago, I would have thought the best recruiter in the country is probably doing more work than at any other time of year leading into the draft period for their respective club/institution. They would be contracted until after the draft period and as such are not able to just head over to punt road cause we splashed some cash at them.
Like, ffs
So this scenario of throwing $ at someone has never worked since time immemorial?
If you don't try you don't know.
RFC does not even try.
Were our recruiters out doing the hard yards 3 months ago?
I don't think so, they most probably never have, which is why we are in the state we are in.
i think this department is the main reason we are in the state we are in, I am very interested to see how much scrutiny it has come under in "the review"
So you may say " ffs " .... really?.....