Peggy Statement

[(•))(©™]

So, who judges Peggy's worth?

Lol. What a pack of nepotistic crooks.

Where did you get that image from?
That's the first I've seen of it and it looks as if it's that latest version with those four members.

This is the original but please note, I've tried to get to the original as credited but can't raise it now.

This is the link where I first saw it. The quote I posted came from the source page:

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/125242/default.aspx

al has found and posted the link with the full description:

Nominations Committee Established

The Board of the Richmond Football Club Limited (“Club”) have established a Board Nominations Committee (“Committee”).

The committee is responsible for considering and advising the Board on matters relating to the appointment of directors.

Specifically, it will establish a transparent and formal procedure to identify individuals who are qualified to become Board members.

This process will ensure that at all times, the Board comprises those most suited to adequately discharge its responsibilities and duties.


The membership of the Committee will comprise:


Ø    Mr Emmett Dunne (Chair)
Assistant Commissioner Victoria Police Ethical Standards Department
35 year career Victoria Police
Australian Police Medal 2010
Graduate Diploma Business Management
130 VFL Games for Richmond and Footscray Football Clubs, Life Member Richmond Football Club, Member Richmond Premiership Team 1980, Member AFL Tribunal 1993 to present

 
Ø    Ms Henriette Rothschild
General Manager of Hay Group Pacific.
Works with Boards and executive teams in the corporate and NFP sector on organisational change, board effectiveness and executive capability.
Worked with the RFC Board in the past on CEO succession, executive development and Board facilitation.
Psychologist with a business and marketing background.

 
Ø    Mr Michael Green
Practised as a solicitor 1970-1995;
Clerk of Greens List at the Victorian Bar 1996 to the present
Played with the Richmond 1966-1971; 1973-1975
146 games;  82 goals
Played in 1967, 1969, 1973 and 1974 premierships.
Member of the Richmond Team of the Century and the Richmond Hall of Fame.

Ø    Mr Maurice O’Shannassy
Club Vice President
Club Board member since 2004.
Former Managing Director for Black Rock Investment Management (Australia) Ltd (formerly Merrill Lynch Investment Managers).

 

The Committee in assessing candidates will consider:

Ø    The achievements of the candidate in their careers – both business and non business;

Ø    Compatibility with the balance and diversity of skills, experience and competencies within the existing Board ;

Ø    Compatibility of the candidate’s credentials with the existing strategic needs of the Club; and

Ø    Motivation of the candidate.

 

The Committee will meet and consider potential candidates at the following times:

Ø    During the annual Board nomination period in the lead up to the Annual General Meeting; and

Ø    At other times when a casual vacancy is created through the resignation of an existing director.

 
The Club board member that forms part of the Committee will be rotated periodically.  The Club Board member on the Committee cannot fill the role as Chairperson.  An existing Club director cannot serve on the Committee if their elected term expires in that year.

In discharging their responsibilities the Committee members have a duty to act in the best interests of the Club as a whole, irrespective of personal, professional, commercial or other interests, loyalties or affiliations.

It should also be noted the Board of the Club have engaged the services of Hay Group to review the operation of the existing Board as a whole and its individual members to ensure that the Board is well placed to achieve its stated objectives in the most effective and efficient manner.

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/nominations%20committee/tabid/18473/default.aspx

Note that the rules I've highlighted in yellow are not in the latest version posted.
The wombats must not realize that there are other internet sources out there so you can't just scrub and forget what you post previously.
May be a good basis for a question at the AGM.
"Why have you changed the rules of the Nominations Committee, specifically about the chairmanship and serving in a re-election year?"

Its a good place to start.

[(•))(©™]

AGM or EGM ?

[RedanTiger]

Probably AGM since the FoFers have dropped off.

Mind you, if the Malvern Hotel group decide they can't just settle for the two seats up for election and ask around for 100 signatures to force a spill of the entire board, I think they'd only need half an hour to get them with Mandie, Silk and Ralph families and friends to the fore.

   

[(•))(©™]

Makes this sound arrogant

“Our members are perfectly entitled to run for the Board and we have processes in place to allow them to do just that,” Richmond President Peggy O’Neal said.

“We encourage any of our 70,000 members wishing to do so to engage in our nominations process or through our normal electoral process as part of the

[Harry]

Probably AGM since the FoFers have dropped off.

Mind you, if the Malvern Hotel group decide they can't just settle for the two seats up for election and ask around for 100 signatures to force a spill of the entire board, I think they'd only need half an hour to get them with Mandie, Silk and Ralph families and friends to the fore.

 

They already have the 100 signatures

[FooffooValve]

Probably AGM since the FoFers have dropped off.

Mind you, if the Malvern Hotel group decide they can't just settle for the two seats up for election and ask around for 100 signatures to force a spill of the entire board, I think they'd only need half an hour to get them with Mandie, Silk and Ralph families and friends to the fore.

 

They already have the 100 signatures

That's another thing that needs changing. 100 signatures is ridiculous - a vestige of a time when we had 30,000 members or so. Should need at least 1000 to force an EGM.

[Go Richo 12]

Probably AGM since the FoFers have dropped off.

Mind you, if the Malvern Hotel group decide they can't just settle for the two seats up for election and ask around for 100 signatures to force a spill of the entire board, I think they'd only need half an hour to get them with Mandie, Silk and Ralph families and friends to the fore.

 

They already have the 100 signatures

That's another thing that needs changing. 100 signatures is ridiculous - a vestige of a time when we had 30,000 members or so. Should need at least 1000 to force an EGM.

That's a lot of supporters who need to buy a membership at the last minute.

[(•))(©™]

Constitution is over a hundred years old.
Probably only had 1200 members when it was written. Lol.
One Indigenous player (Fitzroy)and he couldn't even get a massage

So,
After finally agreeing to meet with the would be rivals, Oneal is supposedly putting the proposals
to the current board. 


Challengers have the numbers to call an EGM.
EGM would result in complete board takeover.
EGM would cost the club 100k.
New board should pay out of their own pocket if successful.

[(•))(©™]

Probably AGM since the FoFers have dropped off.

Mind you, if the Malvern Hotel group decide they can't just settle for the two seats up for election and ask around for 100 signatures to force a spill of the entire board, I think they'd only need half an hour to get them with Mandie, Silk and Ralph families and friends to the fore.

 

That's ultimately what needs to happen. Hard to accept that they simply went away after that night. 

[(•))(©™]

Haters have so many personal opinions on a number of the challengers but what of the incumbents ?

Is it widely accepted amongst the can eaters that, lawyers and accountants are beyond professional reproach?

[Stalin]

From the President's report. Big claim to make if it isn't true.

Can you provide details?

From the 2015 AR:

The Club has reported a net profit of $458,586 for the financial year ended 31 October. This is the Club’s 11th consecutive profit – an outstanding result given we operate in such a competitive market. The Club achieved this result off a revenue base of $46.7 million, an increase of $2.3 million year-on- year.
Pleasingly the Club now has cash reserves in excess of $2 million. This represents a turnaround of almost $7 million based on our debt position five years ago. At the same time the Club has significantly increased its investment in football. In 2015, for example, the Club invested $8 million more in football that in did in 2010.
The Club’s net asset position increased over the year to $24.2 million. 2015 Highlights
• Home and away attendances of 1.05 million which ranked us number one in the AFL.
• TV audiences of 16 million, representing an increase of 13%.
• Record sponsorship revenue.
• Record corporate and coterie revenue.
• Record membership of 71,339.

LMAO.

What a crock of poo.

Which bit? Specifically.

I take it that you believe that the annual report is untrue?

"An outstanding result"

[WilliamPowell]

Haters have so many personal opinions on a number of the challengers but what of the incumbents ?

Is it widely accepted amongst the can eaters that, lawyers and accountants are beyond professional reproach?

I like to think I'm above professional reproach 

Probably AGM since the FoFers have dropped off.

Mind you, if the Malvern Hotel group decide they can't just settle for the two seats up for election and ask around for 100 signatures to force a spill of the entire board, I think they'd only need half an hour to get them with Mandie, Silk and Ralph families and friends to the fore.

 

They already have the 100 signatures

That's another thing that needs changing. 100 signatures is ridiculous - a vestige of a time when we had 30,000 members or so. Should need at least 1000 to force an EGM.

Personally I think it should be either 2000 signatures or 5% of toal members whichever is greater.

[🏅Dooks]

Haters have so many personal opinions on a number of the challengers but what of the incumbents ?

Is it widely accepted amongst the can eaters that, lawyers and accountants are beyond professional reproach?

Can eaters Oxy? Nevwr knew you were a fellow Wop

[Stalin]

From the President's report. Big claim to make if it isn't true.

Can you provide details?

From the 2015 AR:

The Club has reported a net profit of $458,586 for the financial year ended 31 October. This is the Club’s 11th consecutive profit – an outstanding result given we operate in such a competitive market. The Club achieved this result off a revenue base of $46.7 million, an increase of $2.3 million year-on- year.
Pleasingly the Club now has cash reserves in excess of $2 million. This represents a turnaround of almost $7 million based on our debt position five years ago. At the same time the Club has significantly increased its investment in football. In 2015, for example, the Club invested $8 million more in football that in did in 2010.
The Club’s net asset position increased over the year to $24.2 million. 2015 Highlights
• Home and away attendances of 1.05 million which ranked us number one in the AFL.
• TV audiences of 16 million, representing an increase of 13%.
• Record sponsorship revenue.
• Record corporate and coterie revenue.
• Record membership of 71,339.

Just wondering why you left out the last "point of success"
Regarding gender equality.

Yes, this is a key factor in being a successful football club and even more Important when being governed by a woman.

Richmond.

Crap at football.

But very politically correct

[tony_montana]

Haters have so many personal opinions on a number of the challengers but what of the incumbents ?

Is it widely accepted amongst the can eaters that, lawyers and accountants are beyond professional reproach?

Can eaters Oxy? Nevwr knew you were a fellow Wop

haha havent heard that saying since highschool