Peter Casey - Board Candidate for 2016 Election

[Rodgerramjet]

 
Like all members, Kerry felt the disappointment of the Club’s on-field performance last season. She – and the entire Board – recognised change was needed and that change has subsequently been made.
 

Actually that statement is a lie, if it were true, she and the board would have acted 2 years ago. In fact it wasn't until they felt the pressure from the membership that they actually did anything.

You can quite adequately describe our current management as reactionary management not proactive management.

This has to be one of your points of difference Peter Casey and Simon Wallace, I hope you both get up.

[FlashGordon]

Kerry Ryan is a lifelong Richmond supporter, passionate about delivering members the ultimate on-field success. As a first-term Board member, Kerry is seeking re-election for another term as a Richmond director.
 
Like all members, Kerry felt the disappointment of the Club’s on-field performance last ..

This is where I should out in one of these 

The above has been taken directly off the RFC website

You need to post the correct link to reference it correctly

Please do it or we'll have to remove it

what?? like do we have some copyright laws being pushed upon us by our beloved board?  Come on man, like it aint like its the vote to save the planet, its close though 

[RedanTiger]

Kerry Ryan is a lifelong Richmond supporter, passionate about delivering members the ultimate on-field success. As a first-term Board member, Kerry is seeking re-election for another term as a Richmond director.
 
Like all members, Kerry felt the disappointment of the Club’s on-field performance last ..

This is where I should out in one of these 

The above has been taken directly off the RFC website

You need to post the correct link to reference it correctly

Please do it or we'll have to remove it

what?? like do we have some copyright laws being pushed upon us by our beloved board?  Come on man, like it aint like its the vote to save the planet, its close though 

No.
Citing the source allows readers to go check it out for themselves rather than posters only having selected sections, probably out of context.

[WilliamPowell]

what?? like do we have some copyright laws being pushed upon us by our beloved board?  Come on man, like it aint like its the vote to save the planet, its close though 

Suggest you read the site posting rules and guidelines about posting directly from other sites and the requirement to reference correctly

http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=13.0

In particular

2.   Plagiarism: will not and cannot be allowed. If you are posting threads that are direct copies from other sites (eg Real Footy, RFC website etc) and this includes other “unofficial” sites you must quote the source/link. Also, we request that if you use information from this site as discussion topics on other forums that you quote OER as the source and post the appropriate link. Due to legal requirements failure to quote the correct source/link will result in the post being either edited if we can locate the source or removed. Before resorting to removing any post we will endeavour to contact the original OER poster to get them to edit their post. If we are unable to do that OER will endeavour to find the source and edit the post.

So I'll ask again please supply the appropriate link

[FlashGordon]

what?? like do we have some copyright laws being pushed upon us by our beloved board?  Come on man, like it aint like its the vote to save the planet, its close though 

Suggest you read the site posting rules and guidelines about posting directly from other sites and the requirement to reference correctly

http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=13.0

In particular

2.   Plagiarism: will not and cannot be allowed. If you are posting threads that are direct copies from other sites (eg Real Footy, RFC website etc) and this includes other “unofficial” sites you must quote the source/link. Also, we request that if you use information from this site as discussion topics on other forums that you quote OER as the source and post the appropriate link. Due to legal requirements failure to quote the correct source/link will result in the post being either edited if we can locate the source or removed. Before resorting to removing any post we will endeavour to contact the original OER poster to get them to edit their post. If we are unable to do that OER will endeavour to find the source and edit the post.

So I'll ask again please supply the appropriate link

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-11-25/director-kerry-ryan-stands-for-reelection

[Francois Jackson]

Just received the email re: the Casey Ticket

Was it also on the clubs website?

If so at least they are inconsistent or was it a reaction to all certain emails?

[RedanTiger]

Just received the email re: the Casey Ticket

Was it also on the clubs website?

If so at least they are inconsistent or was it a reaction to all certain emails?

Reaction from the other candidates.
Casey has already mentioned it here.

And NO, it is NOT on the club website like the two current directors.

Just a heads up - I have asked the Returning Office to forward a copy of my Action Plan/Prospectus to all member. Apologies to those who have already voted or detest an avalanche of emails, or have no interest in the material.

Simon may also seek an access pathway to members so that all candidates have the ability to reach members via an RFC channel.

We await Simon's email AND the article from both on the club website.

[bigtigercasey]

Simon's is in progress, but I am not so confident about the web.

[RedanTiger]

Simon's is in progress, but I am not so confident about the web.

And these current directors are valuable because of their attributes in Ethics and governance.

Richmond president Peggy O’Neal said of Dunne, “He brings a particularly strong skill set in areas such as ethical leadership, culture and capability, integrity and security – areas of paramount importance in the modern game.”  http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-08-18/emmett-dunne-to-join-richmond-board

Said Richmond president Peggy O’Neal of Ryan, “She has a great understanding of corporate governance, risk management and compliance, through other boards she has served on, and corporate reviews and analysis she has undertaken.” http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-10-07/kerry-ryan-joins-richmond-board

It is a demonstration of their ethics and governance that they accept this unfair election process in their favour.

IF they were ETHICAL, as soon as they were aware of their PR pieces on the club website and emails they should have asked the question; "Where are the other candidates pieces?"
When the answer was that there were none planned for the two challengers, then an ETHICAL candidate would say: "Well you better take mine down until ALL candidates have the same level of support".

By comparison, on another fan forum, Simon Wallace even went to the trouble of posting a link to Kerry Ryan's website. That's ethics in action, above and beyond. 

Don't just accept what the PR is, judge them on their action NOW, as current directors of the Richmond Football Club.

It's also worth noting that Dunne says of Ryan: "She has also had significant involvement with membership organisations and understands the membership ethic."  http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-11-30/not-dunne-yet-at-tigerland

They are so understanding of the membership ethic (sic) that Dunne doesn't even mention the members in his PR piece, while on her website Ryan has NO links allowing members to communicate with her.

As can be seen by the quote from Bigtigercasey above, not only do the two challengers have websites with links via facebook and twitter but both engage on at least two fan forums that I know.

Judge them all on their actions, not what they say.
judge the Administration of the club on their actions, not what they say.

[bigtigercasey]

Simon's is in progress, but I am not so confident about the web.

And these current directors are valuable because of their attributes in Ethics and governance.

Richmond president Peggy O’Neal said of Dunne, “He brings a particularly strong skill set in areas such as ethical leadership, culture and capability, integrity and security – areas of paramount importance in the modern game.”  http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-08-18/emmett-dunne-to-join-richmond-board

Said Richmond president Peggy O’Neal of Ryan, “She has a great understanding of corporate governance, risk management and compliance, through other boards she has served on, and corporate reviews and analysis she has undertaken.” http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-10-07/kerry-ryan-joins-richmond-board

It is a demonstration of their ethics and governance that they accept this unfair election process in their favour.

IF they were ETHICAL, as soon as they were aware of their PR pieces on the club website and emails they should have asked the question; "Where are the other candidates pieces?"
When the answer was that there were none planned for the two challengers, then an ETHICAL candidate would say: "Well you better take mine down until ALL candidates have the same level of support".

By comparison, on another fan forum, Simon Wallace even went to the trouble of posting a link to Kerry Ryan's website. That's ethics in action, above and beyond. 

Don't just accept what the PR is, judge them on their action NOW, as current directors of the Richmond Football Club.

It's also worth noting that Dunne says of Ryan: "She has also had significant involvement with membership organisations and understands the membership ethic."  http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-11-30/not-dunne-yet-at-tigerland

They are so understanding of the membership ethic (sic) that Dunne doesn't even mention the members in his PR piece, while on her website Ryan has NO links allowing members to communicate with her.

As can be seen by the quote from Bigtigercasey above, not only do the two challengers have websites with links via facebook and twitter but both engage on at least two fan forums that I know.

Judge them all on their actions, not what they say.
judge the Administration of the club on their actions, not what they say.

Where is the "like" button?

Well said Redan. I have had some interesting and circular conversation abut access to the RFC website. It is an interesting story, but one which I cannot elaborate in the run up to elections. If I am not successful, I will happily share the stories.

I am pleased to say, however, there is much room for improvement!

Cheers

[YellowandBlackBlood]

Voted Casey and Wallace.

If anything we need robust discussion at the board level and I hate how the club has all these yes people that are always "endorsed". Being on the same page is one thing but if that page is the wrong page nobody is there to argue that point.

[Muscles]

Voted Casey and Wallace.

If anything we need robust discussion at the board level and I hate how the club has all these yes people that are always "endorsed". Being on the same page is one thing but if that page is the wrong page nobody is there to argue that point.

Me too, voted for Wallace and Casey.  I don't like the look of the way the president and the current Board appear to favouring their candidates.  To me it speaks of a disregard of the membership.

[Francois Jackson]

X 3

The attitude of the whole club in this campaign further highlights why they have lost the plot

[Yeahright]

Voted Casey and Wallace.

If anything we need robust discussion at the board level and I hate how the club has all these yes people that are always "endorsed". Being on the same page is one thing but if that page is the wrong page nobody is there to argue that point.

Me too, voted for Wallace and Casey.  I don't like the look of the way the president and the current Board appear to favouring their candidates.  To me it speaks of a disregard of the membership.

Another example of the club putting themselves before the members supporters. They don't give a poo what we think as long as we fork out our cash

[YellowandBlackBlood]

Voted Casey and Wallace.

If anything we need robust discussion at the board level and I hate how the club has all these yes people that are always "endorsed". Being on the same page is one thing but if that page is the wrong page nobody is there to argue that point.

Me too, voted for Wallace and Casey.  I don't like the look of the way the president and the current Board appear to favouring their candidates.  To me it speaks of a disregard of the membership.

Another example of the club putting themselves before the members supporters. They don't give a poo what we think as long as we fork out our cash

You just don't let things go do you? Like one of those bull terriers that have to be killed before they stop biting you.