I see Nahas is running in that group as well and I incorrectly reported that he was not at training. I never saw him as part of any of the training drills so I'm unsure whether he was excluded from full training or I just missed him on the day. ???
No MT, I am happy to bow to your superior training knowledge.
With all the oversights I made (ie it was Vickery in the last marking drill not Griffith, Nahas WAS at training etc) I think your job is more than safe. Certainly makes me appreciate your insight more and how difficult it is to identify players at this stage of the year. That was my first training session and I am unlikely to attend another until late Jan if at all.
I think you could be correct al, Griffiths looks like he will be more than fine much quicker than the footy world believed he would. The big slight on him was that he was injury prone but from the people I know who have inside knowledge of him, he is not injury prone at all. His shoulder etc could have been blown up by certain medico's who may have had links to the Tigers but who's to say
As always time will tell whether he is a find or otherwise.
Post looks big already MT which is scary at his age. If he continues to increase in size then he will be a monster and we may have an embarrassment of riches with forwards in the future
The media are reporting that we are likely to take Grimes in the PSD.
Stripes
