Seems like a good player to upgrade if we need to or for reward. He went ok last year too.
Seriously?! After one preseason game you're willing to give him the nod?
No, if you read my post I said.."he went ok last year too" so stop the crap will you, enough with the baiting poo on this forum.
Well actually if you read the post because you have made two sentences you have given the impression that you have made the decision based on one practice game and as an afterthought added in last years performance.
However in regards to Nank you believe Hampson is the better because Nank has only played one practice game for the RFC. However Nank also played last year and done fairly well in the games he played.
So how come whats good enough for one player isn't good enough for another.
I call it inconsistency in argument but given what we all have to put up with you from past experience I wouldn't expect anything less.
