Author Topic: 'Third man up' rule tweaked / Strict deliberate behind rule to remain (afl)  (Read 1202 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
'Third man up' rule tweaked ahead of round one

AFL.com.au
March 17, 2017


The AFL has tweaked its new 'third man up' rule to ensure a passive player hit by a throw-in at a stoppage will not be penalised.

A memo, seen by AFL.com.au, was sent to all AFL clubs on Friday morning from new AFL football operations boss Simon Lethlean, to inform them of the modification.

From round one, umpires are instructed to call play on "if the ball strikes the non-designated ruck, who is passive and has no intention to contest or impact the ruck contest".

The League's new ruck rule, designed to ban the third man up at ruck contests, came under fire during the pre-season when Adelaide's Dean Gore had a free kick paid against him after he was struck in the back by a boundary throw-in that fell short of the two nominated ruckmen.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The clubs were also asked for feedback on the stricter interpretation of the deliberate rushed behind rule, as well as the trial of a more lenient penalty.

During the first three weeks of the JLT Community Series, the punishment for a deliberate rushed behind was a ball-up 14 metres out from goal, rather than a free kick from the goal line.

After surveying the 18 clubs and analysing the results, the League decided the penalty for a deliberate rushed behind would remain a free kick from the goal line, as was the case last year.

The stricter interpretation as outlined to clubs ahead of the JLT Community Series, will also remain, meaning players who try to rush a behind from "outside of the top of the kick-off line (nine metres) and its extension to the behind post", will be penalised.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-03-17/third-man-up-rule-tweaked-ahead-of-round-one

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
AFL defends 'third man up' call against Kangaroos.

THE AFL has ticked off the controversial umpiring decision that saw Western Bulldogs midfielder Josh Dunkley awarded a free kick in the dying seconds of the third quarter in Friday's three-point win against North Melbourne for being infringed upon in a ruck contest.

It appeared Marcus Bontempelli nominated to be the Bulldog ruckman in the third term contest, as he raised his right hand before Dunkley lifted both arms in the air, while Roo Andrew Swallow kept Dunkley away from North ruckman Todd Goldstein.

However, match audio confirmed Dunkley was first to say he would be the one to contest against Goldstein, before any indication came from Bontempelli.

Following that, Bontempelli put his hand up and the umpire refused the cue.

Swallow and teammate Jamie Macmillan pointed to the big screen and remonstrated after the free kick, saying Bontempelli was the ruck contestant.

However the umpire is heard to say "he'd already nominated" in reference to Dunkley.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-04-15/afl-defends-third-man-up-call-against-kangaroos

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Now can anyone explain how this farce and confusion around ruck nominations is good for the game? Why was third man up banned in the first place?