« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Still questions on Richmond's depth as it wasn't tested this year: Ralph (SEN)  (Read 2748 times)

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
Re: Still questions on Richmond's depth as it wasn't tested this year: Ralph (SEN)
« Reply #15 on: November 09, 2017, 12:00:30 PM »
Well there was Lennon playing in the twos .....there was a little uproar at the time he wasn't selected.
Logged
Unleash the tornado

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Still questions on Richmond's depth as it wasn't tested this year: Ralph (SEN)
« Reply #16 on: November 09, 2017, 05:16:40 PM »
For the record, we used 38 players this year. Only the Dogs last year used more players (39) of all the premiership sides since 1990.

Throughout the 2017 season only Carlton (39) and Gold Coast (42) used more players than Richmond.

The AFL team who had the least number of players this year was Adelaide with 31.

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2017-11-09/big-deployment-of-tiger-troops
Logged

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Still questions on Richmond's depth as it wasn't tested this year: Ralph (SEN)
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2017, 08:48:41 AM »
But but but we had a dream run with injuries..
Logged

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1337
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Still questions on Richmond's depth as it wasn't tested this year: Ralph (SEN)
« Reply #18 on: November 10, 2017, 09:58:08 AM »
Quote from: tony_montana on November 10, 2017, 08:48:41 AM
But but but we had a dream run with injuries..

A lot of our changes were not forced by injury but seeking the best performing 22
Logged

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7554
Re: Still questions on Richmond's depth as it wasn't tested this year: Ralph (SEN)
« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2017, 11:51:28 AM »
Quote from: tony_montana on November 10, 2017, 08:48:41 AM
But but but we had a dream run with injuries..

Still maintain apart from top 4, Nank and possibly Astbury/Grimes, we have plenty of cover for the others
Logged
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »