Author Topic: Even our 'bad stats' are good stats  (Read 529 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95453
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Even our 'bad stats' are good stats
« on: February 10, 2018, 07:13:08 PM »
The bad stats: Where your club struggled in 2017

Nathan Schmook
afl.com.au
10 Feb 2018


RICHMOND

KEY STAT               RESULT    LEAGUE RANK

Kicking efficiency       62.8%    #18
Uncontested marks     73.5    #17
Hit-out win rate          35.9%    #18

SUMMARY
The Tigers would not have lost any sleep through the season about their 18th ranking for kicking efficiency. Controlling the ball and taking uncontested marks (17th) was not a focus of their new game style and these rankings are almost a badge of honour. The new plan under Hardwick was to move the ball quickly after a turnover and get the ball inside 50 any way possible. That's when the small forwards and pressing midfielders could get to work, either winning the ball or forcing forward-half turnovers and scoring. In a game of territory, the sideways and backward kicks that lead to uncontested marks and lift a team's kicking efficiency were gone. A requirement of the smaller line-up was the absence of a second ruckman for much of the season, with wingman Shaun Grigg nominating as the ruckman at some stoppages. That explains the Tigers' low ranking for hit-out win rate.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-02-10/the-bad-stats-where-your-club-struggled-in-2017

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Even our 'bad stats' are good stats
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2018, 07:41:58 PM »
We will miss Rioli in the ruck too.... :shh
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.