Author Topic: Jack Ross [merged]  (Read 110118 times)

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #210 on: March 18, 2022, 12:57:22 AM »
How can he get a game's and had chances while Hugo and Dow alot better.

Heck I'd rather play Caddy over Ross after tonight, and that's saying something...

Would you play him on the flanks as well? :shh


Ross, another player playing out of position.

He is a midfielder. Play him there.

At least someone gets it.... :shh :shh

"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #211 on: March 18, 2022, 01:07:24 AM »
Crap excuse.

Plenty of midfielders have been played in different positions over the years and flourished some even contributed until a midfield position became a more permanent position. We see this happen all the time.

Ross isn’t demanding a midfield spot. Too soft to play midfield and he’s a panic merchant. poos himself even on a wing. When I watch him play I wish we still had Brandon Ellis.  :rollin
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #212 on: March 18, 2022, 01:22:39 AM »
Crap post.

Assertions based on nothing but speculation and displaying the memory of a goldfish. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #213 on: March 18, 2022, 05:39:14 PM »
I could be wrong but they have played him out of position, To develop his engine and outside game.
He can play as an inside  mid and needs to be given a chance before he is put in the recycle bin imo

Sheesh we keep on getting belted inside and here we have Ross who can play inside apparently but we just refuse to do so.

Hmm if that is the case id say someone is getting things awfully wrong.

We need to be competetive at stoppages to little is left to too few and they sure as hell don't see Ross as the answer and to be honest neither do i.

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #214 on: March 18, 2022, 05:46:00 PM »
He should be in the guts become a battering ram like cotchin. Just get the ball out. Thats all hed have to do.

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #215 on: March 18, 2022, 06:43:42 PM »
I tend to agree , he is not a quarter back or running winger and Cotch is cooked by halftime
His way of playing is similar to Cotchins and you wouldn’t play on a wing or at half back
We need someone to stop the slaughter in the packs

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #216 on: March 18, 2022, 07:41:29 PM »
I think Ross has enough chances, but who else is there.

Our problem was everything in the middle from contested ball to clearance work to setting up stoppages to ruck work. Got belted everywhere in the last. I don't think Ross improves us that much.
Go Tigers!

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #217 on: March 18, 2022, 07:51:09 PM »
But he sees ball gets ball and spectate when around packs. Cotchin has done that role in the past and without meatball who’s our extractors , maybe Graham but someone needs to play the role

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4461
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #218 on: March 19, 2022, 03:00:24 AM »
His debut is still the best game I’ve seen him play. Agree with others here that his best position is as an inside mid which is where he played in his debut season until his injury against freo if I remember correctly.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #219 on: March 20, 2022, 12:06:31 PM »
But he sees ball gets ball and spectate when around packs. Cotchin has done that role in the past and without meatball who’s our extractors , maybe Graham but someone needs to play the role

Not sure Jack Graham is the answer either.
I have never seen him dominate contested ball or win a lot of clearances so checked out his career stats.
I think in a way Graham is part of the problem because he consistently fails to make decent contributions in these areas.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #220 on: March 20, 2022, 04:31:29 PM »
Interesting point Claw. Does anyone have grahams clearance numbers?

Perhaps he needs to wear some of the criticism also.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #221 on: March 20, 2022, 05:26:07 PM »
Interesting point Claw. Does anyone have grahams clearance numbers?

Perhaps he needs to wear some of the criticism also.
1 clearance on the night.

4 - Nank
3 - Soldo, Cotch, Dusty
2 - Bolton, Prestia
1 - Graham, Ross, Aarts, Edwards, Grimes.
----
Total: 22

Cripps (8 ), Kennedy (8 ) & Cerra (6) had 22 just between themselves. Hewett and Pittonet had 4 each as well. De Koning 2 and Docherty 3.

Says a lot about our midfielders' ability to win the contested footy right now that our rucks end up as our main clearance winners  :-\.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #222 on: March 20, 2022, 10:15:32 PM »
Interesting point Claw. Does anyone have grahams clearance numbers?

Perhaps he needs to wear some of the criticism also.
1 clearance on the night.

4 - Nank
3 - Soldo, Cotch, Dusty
2 - Bolton, Prestia
1 - Graham, Ross, Aarts, Edwards, Grimes.
----
Total: 22

Cripps (8 ), Kennedy (8 ) & Cerra (6) had 22 just between themselves. Hewett and Pittonet had 4 each as well. De Koning 2 and Docherty 3.

Says a lot about our midfielders' ability to win the contested footy right now that our rucks end up as our main clearance winners  :-\.

Jack Graham 181cm 83kg 24yo 78 games. Career stats. Not pretty reading.

8.5 kicks
7.7 h/b
16.2 disposals.
C/P 6.0
U/P 10.6
E/D 11.8
D/E 72.8
CL  1.9
C/CL 0.5
S/CL 1.4
M/G 253.5
S/I 4.3
G/A 0.5
GLS 0.4


Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40307
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #223 on: March 20, 2022, 10:30:52 PM »
Seems to be a stat that conveniently seems to have not be included  :whistle

Having made that observation

It is very easy to quote stat's and I get that but every player has a role. Some roles are not about the number of kicks, handballs.....

When you hear coaches talk about specific players and their roles within the teams then I can assure you it isn't all about stat's, not even close

But I also get that doesn't suit peoples narratives so I will leave it at that
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #224 on: March 20, 2022, 10:49:43 PM »
Seems to be a stat that conveniently seems to have not be included  :whistle

Having made that observation

It is very easy to quote stat's and I get that but every player has a role. Some roles are not about the number of kicks, handballs.....

When you hear coaches talk about specific players and their roles within the teams then I can assure you it isn't all about stat's, not even close

But I also get that doesn't suit peoples narratives so I will leave it at that

So tell us WP  what do you percieve Grahams role to be.

We use stats to confirm what we see. The talk was he doesnt win many clearances and the stats clearly back that up.
They actually show he is not overly inside but also that he is not overly great on the outside.

Here we are being belted inside and its not just about this week either and we play blokes as juniors who were good there in other roles. If its not the players fault then its the coaches.
There was talk of Graham being captain by some based on what? i ask.