Author Topic: Jack Ross [merged]  (Read 110141 times)

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #240 on: March 27, 2022, 08:08:42 PM »
There were worse , it was an average game but may have had a role . 3 tackles is good if you compare to the rest of the side

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40307
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #241 on: March 27, 2022, 09:02:07 PM »
Was better today but there was one incident in the last where he didn't go as hard as je needed too which was disappointing

His disposal again was a worry

But as I said much better today

Listening to Dimma's presser he was happy with him
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3697
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #242 on: March 27, 2022, 09:10:36 PM »
At the ground it looked like a solid performance. Played inside and across the HBF at times. Solid in my book for sure :shh

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40307
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #243 on: March 27, 2022, 09:12:44 PM »
At the ground it looked like a solid performance. Played inside and across the HBF at times. Solid in my book for sure :shh

Was at the game too

Not a fan of the HBF role, his disposal is to "iffy" for that
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #244 on: March 28, 2022, 03:17:25 PM »
Not desperate enough, ball watches too much and hardly wins one on one contests.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #245 on: March 29, 2022, 11:41:41 AM »
Cannot see how people think that was a better game than last week. Was horrible again.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #246 on: April 03, 2022, 06:19:57 PM »
Can’t wait to see him play on the ball. I wonder what kind of poo he will serve us in that position.

One of the biggest duds I have seen since Hardwick came on board, and that’s saying something.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4666
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #247 on: April 03, 2022, 06:21:23 PM »
Started ok but too slow, can't kick and a poor decision maker.  Doesn't bode well

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3744
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #248 on: April 03, 2022, 06:51:47 PM »
It sad to think we have invested all this time into him as one of our future on ballers and it seems he doesn’t have what it takes.

Offline Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2450
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #249 on: April 03, 2022, 07:00:04 PM »
Was actually good early but after that, ummm how do say, crap
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9972
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #250 on: April 03, 2022, 07:07:24 PM »
Was actually good early but after that, ummm how do say, crap

Coached all the instinct out of him so that he could learn the team structure and play a HBF role of course.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #251 on: April 03, 2022, 07:12:46 PM »
It sad to think we have invested all this time into him as one of our future on ballers and it seems he doesn’t have what it takes.

mint he was pick 40, I expected exactly what i am seeing. Garbage. What is disappointing is others see something which is not there.

he is not a footballers hole.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #252 on: April 03, 2022, 11:06:52 PM »
Trouble is he needs to be very good inside and its not happening. Instead hes getting more of it outside and his pace and average disposal means we suffer.
I assume today he was playing as a mid or mostly inside but i just dont  see it. today he had just the one stoppage clearance, just the three tackles and a miserable 4 contested possesions. imo these are the areas we need him to be good in.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #253 on: April 04, 2022, 01:31:04 AM »
Put him in the guts and leave him there...if he's still shyte at the end of the year so be it, delist him...but I'd rather lose because we're giving the likes of him, RCD and even Will Martyn a fair crack at it than persisting with the same old proven duds or running our aging stars into the ground... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Jack Ross [merged]
« Reply #254 on: April 04, 2022, 06:48:30 AM »
Fair call Dio can’t argue with that. Definitely with Rcd and Martyn anyway.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.