A catch that actually is clearly a catch is deemed not to be a catch
While catches that you could argue aren't catches because they clearly touch the grass are given out.
This is where the TV umpire is a joke.
And to make it worse, the rule as it is currently written is a joke. As the "control of the body" is subjective. So every umpire can interpret it differently
Meanwhile every batsmen in the world would walk because they'd deem it a fair catch
Farcical
And BTW a very poor batting effort by the Aussies. Yes the English tactics were pathetic but our batsmen got sucked in. And just on the short ball tactics employed by both sides, let's see if the umpires have the guts to enforce the rules of the game around "intimidating bowling". They can stop it if they've got the guts but I doubt they have.