Author Topic: 2021 Draft thread  (Read 148110 times)

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9974
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #285 on: October 07, 2021, 01:11:25 PM »
This talk from the media of us trying to move our frst up to get Hobbs is purely just speculative nonsense...not only will he still be there at 7(9) there's a fair chance he still will be at 15(17)....if we're trying to move up then surely it's for the likes of Ward, Erasmus or Callaghan? :shh

Yep you'd think so.

Dio, where do you think Amiss will go? One of the better KPF options. Is he worth a punt with 7(9)? Hobbs will likely be there at 15 like you said.

Also keen on Chesser who seems to be a 15-20 pick so it's a damned shame we haven't secured another pick in that range with all of our 3rd rounders.

Offline OneEyedRichmond

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #286 on: October 07, 2021, 01:17:43 PM »
This talk from the media of us trying to move our frst up to get Hobbs is purely just speculative nonsense...not only will he still be there at 7(9) there's a fair chance he still will be at 15(17)....if we're trying to move up then surely it's for the likes of Ward, Erasmus or Callaghan? :shh

100%  ;)

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #287 on: October 07, 2021, 02:01:46 PM »
 :shh




Dio, where do you think Amiss will go? One of the better KPF options. Is he worth a punt with 7(9)? Hobbs will likely be there at 15 like you said.

Assuming they get 6( 8 ) from the scumbaggers for Cerra, reckon Amiss won't get past Freo's second pick 8(10) at the lowest and they'll probably even take him at 6 if they miss out on Erasmus ...either way I'd be very surprised if we took him at 7(9)... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #288 on: October 07, 2021, 02:12:00 PM »
If we miss out on Amiss , I’d be happy with One or Two of Van Rooyen, Williams Bazzo or Alleer, Gibcus would likely be picked

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #289 on: October 07, 2021, 03:40:54 PM »
Of the big blokes I like Rhett Bazzo

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #290 on: October 07, 2021, 04:06:26 PM »
Twomey reckons Roberts will go the late 20's - early 30's.......mind you he also reckoned Naish would go top 10.... :shh

Mitch Knevitt looks like he could rise up the ranks -193 cm mid who just ran second in the 20 m sprint at the combine (2.976).... :shh :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #291 on: October 07, 2021, 04:15:20 PM »
Shockers now have 4 picks inside the top 22...reckon they'll jump on the Sandgropers ..which will probably include at least one of Van Rooyen & Bazzo...though they might have to give up one to trade for Clarke... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #292 on: October 07, 2021, 05:25:16 PM »
Q: Who is Richmond trying to trade up to draft?

Ben Waterworth: They like Ben Hobbs.

Source:[/b] Foxsports' live chat.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #293 on: October 07, 2021, 05:50:06 PM »
I don't reckon Hobbs is worth to trade up to alot better players in the draft might be there at 15 is this a smokescreen.

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #294 on: October 07, 2021, 06:50:14 PM »
I reckon they want Callaghan or Walsh or as i like to say preferably both.

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #295 on: October 07, 2021, 07:47:16 PM »
I reckon they want Callaghan or Walsh or as i like to say preferably both.

Walsh?? Do you mean Ward

Either way looks like we want to fix the midfield with two quality mids

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #296 on: October 07, 2021, 08:12:32 PM »

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #297 on: October 07, 2021, 08:23:44 PM »
Rumour has it, we’re poised to swap picks 42 and 47 for Collingwoods 27
Pick 40 seems to be where it’s at for CCJ :(

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #298 on: October 07, 2021, 09:10:44 PM »
I reckon they want Callaghan or Walsh or as i like to say preferably both.

Walsh?? Do you mean Ward

Either way looks like we want to fix the midfield with two quality mids
Yes sorry Ward who is who Im hoping we get on draft night

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #299 on: October 07, 2021, 09:12:05 PM »
Rumour has it, we’re poised to swap picks 42 and 47 for Collingwoods 27
Pick 40 seems to be where it’s at for CCJ :(
I would do 42 and 47 for 27.  Thats not a bad trade for us.