Author Topic: 2021 Draft thread  (Read 148248 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98248
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #900 on: December 01, 2021, 07:01:55 PM »
Looks hope it ends up much better than it did for our 2014 draft haul in this pic :-\  (although Butler did play in our 2017 premiership).


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98248
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #901 on: December 01, 2021, 07:43:27 PM »
Here's the footage of our 5 new draftees at Richmond station:

Click below to watch:

https://twitter.com/Richmond_FC/status/1465963126248157189

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98248
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #902 on: December 02, 2021, 06:46:14 AM »
THE AFL this week wrote to all clubs to advise of the arrangements for the Pre-Season Supplemental Selection Period (SSP) and the 2022 Mid-Season Rookie Draft (MSRD).

Clubs have been advised the SSP will take place from Monday January 10 to Wednesday March 9, 2022 while the Mid-Season Rookie Draft is currently scheduled for Wednesday June 1, 2022.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/690161/afl-confirms-rookie-rules-for-ssp-mid-season-draft

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98248
    • One-Eyed Richmond
The trades Richmond tried to do during the Draft that didn't come off (afl site)
« Reply #903 on: December 02, 2021, 02:48:12 PM »
Inside the draft: The tension, tactics and trades that didn't come off

Cal Twomey goes inside the hectic first round of the 2021 NAB AFL Draft, revealing whose phone ran hot and which clubs were desperate to trade up.

afl.com.au
2 December 2021


With Gibcus still on the board, some clubs sussed their options. The Giants offered pick 15 and a future first-round pick to Richmond for pick nine.

After Richmond selected key defender Josh Gibcus with pick No.9, pipping midfielder Ben Hobbs for the spot, the Tigers set out to try and nab both players.

THE TIGERS were on the hunt.

... the Tigers looked at ways to bring forward their second first-round pick ...

When Fremantle with the next choice also overlooked Hobbs, the Tigers got on the front foot. St Kilda was on the clock for its pick 11 when the Tigers rang with an offer of picks 17 and 28. The Saints weren't interested in sliding back that far.

A similar deal, involving those two selections plus a future second-round pick for pick 12 and a second-round selection, was put to West Coast. But the Eagles were already in discussions with Port Adelaide about a swap of pick 12 and 14, so knocked back the Tigers' bid to jump up the queue.

Richmond had one last shot at pairing up the Greater Western Victoria Rebels duo, offering pick 17 and 28 to Essendon for pick 13, before the Bombers pounced on Hobbs to bolster their midfield.

... the Tigers chose Brown [at pick 17] to add to their talented defensive group and as a partner to Gibcus in an exciting young backline. Eye-catching forward Kai Lohmann was also in the Tigers' mix.

The Tigers remained active, seeing if they could package picks in the 20s to nab Brisbane's final pick of the first round, but the Lions stuck with it and drafted Lohmann.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/689980/inside-the-draft-the-tension-tactics-and-trades-that-didn-t-come-off

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #904 on: December 02, 2021, 09:36:59 PM »
At least we tried. I remember the trade period where we got mcmahon from footscray and miller came out abd said he was exhausted lol. 1 trade mcmahon equalled exhaustion. No wonder we were stuffed as a club.

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #905 on: December 02, 2021, 10:26:13 PM »
Miller was trying to do everything on his own as manager and had a part time recruiter , he just couldn’t do it on his own. How do you research and monitor players around the country with a skeleton staff. Thank goodness we are financial and can afford staff these days.

Offline yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #906 on: December 03, 2021, 11:32:30 AM »
So Twomey presented no evidence that we were after Hobbs other than the fact that we were trying to trade up.

 :huh :huh :huh

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #907 on: December 03, 2021, 12:08:40 PM »
Pretty sure Clarke has said as much since....if not since he did at least say before the draft that the first pick would likely be one out of Gibcus,Ward,Amiss & Hobbs... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline PremiershipClock

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 84
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #908 on: December 03, 2021, 01:45:48 PM »
Remember when Miller drafted Oakley-Nicholls at pick 8 because he had 'nice eyes'. Or is that just an urban myth!

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #909 on: December 03, 2021, 05:27:47 PM »
Lol, poor JON, should have been a rookie, Miller must have miss read the memo that said 1st pick in the rookie draft

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #910 on: December 06, 2021, 09:43:44 AM »
Lol, poor JON, should have been a rookie, Miller must have miss read the memo that said 1st pick in the rookie draft

Memo?? It was just Miller so no one to send or get memos from

Would have been post it notes

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #911 on: December 06, 2021, 11:13:56 AM »
Remember when Miller drafted Oakley-Nicholls at pick 8 because he had 'nice eyes'. Or is that just an urban myth!
Good bloke as he was mowing his mums lawn when they went to visit him in WA was the story I heard.  I asked Blair Hartley at a supporters club event in 2014, it didnt go down that well.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #912 on: December 06, 2021, 04:27:13 PM »
Remember when Miller drafted Oakley-Nicholls at pick 8 because he had 'nice eyes'. Or is that just an urban myth!
Good bloke as he was mowing his mums lawn when they went to visit him in WA was the story I heard.  I asked Blair Hartley at a supporters club event in 2014, it didnt go down that well.
I asked Wallace about JON at preseason training after JON was drafted and Wallace said JON was 4 years away from playing seniors. Not the sort of thing you want to here about a top 10 pick  :P. At the end of the day, it wasn't JON's fault that he was stupidly judged as a top 10 pick when he was at best really a rookie pick. His kicking technique alone was very suspect.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Knighter

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2744
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #913 on: December 06, 2021, 05:00:47 PM »
Remember when Miller drafted Oakley-Nicholls at pick 8 because he had 'nice eyes'. Or is that just an urban myth!
Good bloke as he was mowing his mums lawn when they went to visit him in WA was the story I heard.  I asked Blair Hartley at a supporters club event in 2014, it didnt go down that well.

What was Blair's problem?  Not like he had anything to do with recruiting JON. 

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2021 Draft thread
« Reply #914 on: December 06, 2021, 09:05:39 PM »
Remember when Miller drafted Oakley-Nicholls at pick 8 because he had 'nice eyes'. Or is that just an urban myth!
LOL once a myth takes hold no matter how much fact comes out  the myth remains.

Greg Miller did not get a whole lot right when it came to our drafts but fmd Oakley Nicholls was not his choice.He has openly said he wanted Travis Varcoe at that pick that was said straight after the draft.. It has  also been acknowledged that fine eyes was given a full time job on the back of his work in the 2005 draft. go figure. I have bought the article up a few times and that is exactly what the club said when they made him full time head of recruiting at the start of 06.
Yes Jackson was only doing it  part time for us in 05  so was Miller virtually, but FJ  was the major player in that draft PART TIME OR NOT.

As inadequate as it was we also had another bloke from NM cannot remember his name  and half a dozen people around the country  giving  regular input.As i said inadequate but the myth makes it sound like there was just Miller and Jackson.