Author Topic: 2016 vs 2023  (Read 2024 times)

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
2016 vs 2023
« on: May 23, 2023, 03:35:32 PM »
i'm hoping someone can do some analysis of 2016 vs 2023 list wise.

We moved on Lids, Newman and Chaplin. 3 fairly experienced guys. We may have moved Newman on the year before but I think it was 2016. We had some really good development but also with Caddy, Prestia and Nank + rookies /late picks of Broad, Castagna, Butler, coming into the side made us very good.

I wonder how much of a similar restructure we could do. We need some rookie small forwards again, our Prestia and Caddy types are Taranto and Hopper. Wonder where else we could find some diamonds. We will have a lot of cap space open you would think.
Go Tigers!

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2888
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2023, 04:18:10 PM »
Well we had Cotchin, dusty, Jack, rance, vlastuin, grimes, houli edwards, lambert all in their primes.
Right now we have Rioli, hopper, Taranto… Graham ? In their primes.
So that’s your difference and the majority of that talent were high draft picks so we either bottom out for a few years or trade off some players for picks immediately.

Personally I’m in favour for the clean out.. can’t be done over one off season but we could make a few trades this off-season to kick start the process. For what it’s worth I’d also definitely trade one of hopper or Taranto.. preferably hopper.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2023, 04:57:06 PM »
Well we had Cotchin, dusty, Jack, rance, vlastuin, grimes, houli edwards, lambert all in their primes.
Right now we have Rioli, hopper, Taranto… Graham ? In their primes.
So that’s your difference and the majority of that talent were high draft picks so we either bottom out for a few years or trade off some players for picks immediately.

Personally I’m in favour for the clean out.. can’t be done over one off season but we could make a few trades this off-season to kick start the process. For what it’s worth I’d also definitely trade one of hopper or Taranto.. preferably hopper.

said this exact thing a few mins ago on another thread. 100% with you on this one and pay some of his wage to make it happen.

what choice do we have to get back into the draft at the top end?



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2023, 05:11:01 PM »
Club has to be brave and put a big name up not Hopper or Taranto.For me Short and Graham and Vlastuin are the pick.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2023, 05:15:09 PM »
Trading Taranto or Hopper - sorry but that's Big Footy level retardation... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline OneEyedRichmond

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2023, 05:25:22 PM »
Well we had Cotchin, dusty, Jack, rance, vlastuin, grimes, houli edwards, lambert all in their primes.
Right now we have Rioli, hopper, Taranto… Graham ? In their primes.
So that’s your difference and the majority of that talent were high draft picks so we either bottom out for a few years or trade off some players for picks immediately.

Personally I’m in favour for the clean out.. can’t be done over one off season but we could make a few trades this off-season to kick start the process. For what it’s worth I’d also definitely trade one of hopper or Taranto.. preferably hopper.

said this exact thing a few mins ago on another thread. 100% with you on this one and pay some of his wage to make it happen.

what choice do we have to get back into the draft at the top end?

Another one that’s cooked… lay off the drugs boys :scream

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2023, 06:58:20 PM »
When McRae took over the Pies, there is no way you could have imagined their list would be capable of what they're doing now. Moore was pretty much the only gun they had. DeGoey was on his 6th last chance, Pendlebury and Sidebottom are older than our vets. Traded Grundy and Treloar, wasted picks on Beams and Treloar originally and Daicos is the only really early pick they have had since the 2018.

We lose a lot of guys to retirement, maybe a couple of delistings, and that'll probably be it for player movement. We don't have young Dusty, Cotch, Jack, Rance etc. on the list, but there is some talent in the right age brackets. New coach and we'll see what happens.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8094
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2023, 07:32:16 PM »
I’m with Wayne -
Vlas has a few years left
I like Balta, his moments are no worse than Alex Rance at same age
Rioli and Baker are stalwarts down back and I think we have plenty of options to replace Grimes and Tarrant down the track with Bauer, Biggie and Young emerging.

The midfield looks thin but we have 3 fantastic anchors with Bolton, Taranto and Hopper. Meatie can play a role supporting them for 2-3 years and ruck stocks are solid with Nank, Soldo and hopefully Collina.
Sonsie looks a keeper but it does fall away after that.

The wings are interesting with Ross playing and Banks, Brown and Clarke all options.

Key forwards are the problem but I’m banking on 3/4 years from Lynch, my hope is Sampson can really come along and I’d go after Himmleberg.
Small forwards are going to be Rioli, Mansell and Cumberland.
Cumberland is going to be a star - he’ll give us 40-50 goals per year.

I think that’s a list we can build around.

While we don’t have a Dusty or a Jack - we don’t know who will emerge from the pack.

This is the fun bit - finding the talent.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2023, 08:15:22 PM »
Lol if people cannot see the difference between 2016 and 2023 then they are in serious denial.

What is happening now was always going to happen fmd ive been saying it since 2020.

Id like a dollar for everytime i asked where is the replacements for, well the stars.
A lot of people here were saying we already have em that the kids are all a graders.

The bottom line is very much like wce we thought we could eke out another flag when it was obvious we needed to go to the draft well.They too have an iffy recruiting record and a coach who has refused to play kids over aging favorites who got him a flag.

All the goings on with Hardwick like a rat jumping off the sinking ship, the horrid performances not just this year but the last three. The horrid list management yes we had damn good reasons why we had to get Taranto and to a lesser extent Hopper we needed those types  regardless of where we were on the ladder. We had none apart from a few old injury riddled past champions with their best way behind them. Yet some are asking 2016 v 2023.

I hope recruiting List management and footy spend are at the fore front of any discussions we have.

For me we pay good money to people to run the club and a huge part of their responsibility is to KNOW  when change and when a list has run its race.
Well we have failed in that and those in charge need to have a good look at themselves.Also its not just on the head coach that need to look in the mirror but the whole footy dept.

What we need to do is 2016 over again where we sacked nearly all the coaches, bought in blokes with fresh ideas poured money at last into the footy dept had the guts to acknowledge that things were wrong and needed to change and had a whole review of the footy dept.

Get it wrong from here on in and we too can look forward to multiple 100 point losses just like the Eagles if we arent already there. Next year will tell that story.

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3744
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2023, 08:22:02 PM »
Lol if people cannot see the difference between 2016 and 2023 then they are in serious denial.

What is happening now was always going to happen fmd ive been saying it since 2020.

Id like a dollar for everytime i asked where is the replacements for, well the stars.
A lot of people here were saying we already have em that the kids are all a graders.

The bottom line is very much like wce we thought we could eke out another flag when it was obvious we needed to go to the draft well.They too have an iffy recruiting record and a coach who has refused to play kids over aging favorites who got him a flag.

All the goings on with Hardwick like a rat jumping off the sinking ship, the horrid performances not just this year but the last three. The horrid list management yes we had damn good reasons why we had to get Taranto and to a lesser extent Hopper we needed those types  regardless of where we were on the ladder. We had none apart from a few old injury riddled past champions with their best way behind them. Yet some are asking 2016 v 2023.

I hope recruiting List management and footy spend are at the fore front of any discussions we have.

For me we pay good money to people to run the club and a huge part of their responsibility is to KNOW  when change and when a list has run its race.
Well we have failed in that and those in charge need to have a good look at themselves.Also its not just on the head coach that need to look in the mirror but the whole footy dept.

What we need to do is 2016 over again where we sacked nearly all the coaches, bought in blokes with fresh ideas poured money at last into the footy dept had the guts to acknowledge that things were wrong and needed to change and had a whole review of the footy dept.

Get it wrong from here on in and we too can look forward to multiple 100 point losses just like the Eagles if we arent already there. Next year will tell that story.
Too true

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2023, 09:23:09 PM »
Lol if people cannot see the difference between 2016 and 2023 then they are in serious denial.

What is happening now was always going to happen fmd ive been saying it since 2020.

Id like a dollar for everytime i asked where is the replacements for, well the stars.
A lot of people here were saying we already have em that the kids are all a graders.

The bottom line is very much like wce we thought we could eke out another flag when it was obvious we needed to go to the draft well.They too have an iffy recruiting record and a coach who has refused to play kids over aging favorites who got him a flag.

All the goings on with Hardwick like a rat jumping off the sinking ship, the horrid performances not just this year but the last three. The horrid list management yes we had damn good reasons why we had to get Taranto and to a lesser extent Hopper we needed those types  regardless of where we were on the ladder. We had none apart from a few old injury riddled past champions with their best way behind them. Yet some are asking 2016 v 2023.

I hope recruiting List management and footy spend are at the fore front of any discussions we have.

For me we pay good money to people to run the club and a huge part of their responsibility is to KNOW  when change and when a list has run its race.
Well we have failed in that and those in charge need to have a good look at themselves.Also its not just on the head coach that need to look in the mirror but the whole footy dept.

What we need to do is 2016 over again where we sacked nearly all the coaches, bought in blokes with fresh ideas poured money at last into the footy dept had the guts to acknowledge that things were wrong and needed to change and had a whole review of the footy dept.

Get it wrong from here on in and we too can look forward to multiple 100 point losses just like the Eagles if we arent already there. Next year will tell that story.

Claw, I think this is a bit dramatic. I agree on the whole that we made the mistake of trying to go for 1 too many, but I'll sleep at night backing the idea at the time and in hindsight I would again in that if it was possible it is rare to be at the top so make the most of it.

I think in terms of nucleus for a mini rebuild you have some decent talent under 30

B: Gibcus Balta Young
HB: Rioli Baker Vlastuin
C: Short Hopper Ross
HF: Cumberland CHF Clarke
F Rioli Ryan FP
R: Nank Taranto Bolton

B: Sonsie Graham Ralphsmith

There are issues sure, top end talent I think you can see there are All Aus potential there in
Taranto, Hopper, Bolton, Rioli, Balta, Short and in time Gibcus. It's thin and would need to be improved upon but missing from that list are current paid stars on our list in

Dusty
Prestia
Lynch
Jack
Cotch
Tarrant
Broad
Grimes

all up would be an enormous war chest that would easily pull in 2-3 genuine stars. Lynch Dusty are on top, top dollar, Prestia wouldn't be fair behind and the older guys added up wouldn't be on pennies either. So the beauty of FA is that we could be really really strong in the market.

I'm with you on the disappointment but I think we have been lucky in a sense that we have developed players well late in drafts and from rookies so that we haven't had to rely on top 10 picks. I'm fascinated to see how we evolve the list from here, I certainly don't think we need a full clean out and be down the bottom for 5 years stock piling picks. In fact we can't anyway with Tasmanian team likely to have a monopoly on those picks soon anyway.
Go Tigers!

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2023, 10:04:48 PM »
I have to agree, a good and fair summary  , we have to and can improve in a lot of areas but let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2023, 11:02:48 PM »
Thanks to Brendan Gale, our club is stable powerhouse. A very attractive destination for any rising star player kicking the football at a near empty Giants or Carrara Stadiums :rollin

There is also those other star players having to endure living in Adelaide and the punce supporters that barrack for them all wishing they had supporters with a clue about footy.

I will back in Blair and Tim already 2 or 3 years ahead on their masterful plan to get quality players excited about playing for a club that is the best place to forge a career.

Our club boasts a great culture, a great supporter base and a great history. And unlike other big name clubs (ie. Carlscum, Essendrugs, West Coke, Adelaide, Melbtank), we haven’t cheated, nor are we racist (ie. Collingwood, Hawthorn).

Our club is a club all potential great players would want to play for.  :gotigers

And why wouldn’t they?
Best stadium, best colours, best mascot, best song!

« Last Edit: May 23, 2023, 11:30:20 PM by Tigeritis™©® »
The club that keeps giving.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2023, 07:54:23 PM »
Show me the evolution of the team from 2017 to last week. Fair dinkum it has been minimal.Thats taking into account we won three flags in that time.

We just dont have the quality and the bottom line is far too few kids have come thru.

The 24 thru say 28 year olds who should be stepping up and taking over are not good enough because they simply remain role players who in a lot of instances have roles that are now redundant.

There is a massive amount of work that needs doing we lack quality and depth in most areas.
Finding a core group of good enough talent and getting them as a group to 80 100 games does not happen in one or two seasons even with astute good f/a and trade aquisitions.
Fair dinkum we are looking down the barrel of at least 5 yrs more like 7 and thats if we get most things right. To think other wise is imo being naieve.

Lets just bite the bullett and get on with the rebuild. the sooner we are honest with where we are at and how long it MAY  take the better off we will be and the  sooner we will get there.

Its when clubs have unrealistic expectations on how long it may take that short cuts happen usually detrimental to where your trying to get to.

Imo we have already wasted three seasons simply because we could not be honest and reralistic.
To me it seems its time to do the hard yards again and cop the pain that comes with it.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9973
Re: 2016 vs 2023
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2023, 08:31:35 PM »
Show me the evolution of the team from 2017 to last week. Fair dinkum it has been minimal.Thats taking into account we won three flags in that time.

We just dont have the quality and the bottom line is far too few kids have come thru.

The 24 thru say 28 year olds who should be stepping up and taking over are not good enough because they simply remain role players who in a lot of instances have roles that are now redundant.

There is a massive amount of work that needs doing we lack quality and depth in most areas.
Finding a core group of good enough talent and getting them as a group to 80 100 games does not happen in one or two seasons even with astute good f/a and trade aquisitions.
Fair dinkum we are looking down the barrel of at least 5 yrs more like 7 and thats if we get most things right. To think other wise is imo being naieve.

Lets just bite the bullett and get on with the rebuild. the sooner we are honest with where we are at and how long it MAY  take the better off we will be and the  sooner we will get there.

Its when clubs have unrealistic expectations on how long it may take that short cuts happen usually detrimental to where your trying to get to.

Imo we have already wasted three seasons simply because we could not be honest and reralistic.
To me it seems its time to do the hard yards again and cop the pain that comes with it.

We're looking at 5-8 years of mediocrity imo.

Unless we trade into the draft like Geelong it will be 2+ years by the time we start scoring good draft picks and then 5+ for them to hit their straps if we nail the picks