Author Topic: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)  (Read 1855 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98225
    • One-Eyed Richmond
CORNES AND KING DISCUSS THE NEXT STEPS IN RICHMOND’S REBUILD

Lachlan Geleit
SEN
26 April 2024


What is Richmond’s next step in their rebuild?

That was the question on the mind of Kane Cornes and SEN Breakfast co-host David King after the Tigers slumped to 1-6 after their 42-85 loss to Melbourne on Anzac Eve.

While Richmond tried to rebuild on the run following their premiership successes by adding the likes of Tim Taranto and Jacob Hopper via trade, both Cornes and King think that the club now needs to hit the pointy end of the draft hard to acquire top-level young talent.

The duo discussed how Richmond does that and the futures of out-of-contract utility Liam Baker, free agent Dustin Martin and other ways that they could manoeuvre to get those picks, including trading players that hold value.

Cornes thinks that the Tigers can no longer look at their list as a short-term proposition and should instead look at five years down the line when they may enter premiership contention again.

Cornes: “What do you do? … Can you finish as low as possible without suggesting that you're gonna tank to try and get a pick one or two?

“That's the discussions that Richmond now must have, don't they?”

King: “You can't have this discussion in hindsight. So what do you do? This is the old discussion.

“So everyone says, ‘Oh, you know Sam Mitchell cut too hard. This is going to be a 10-year rebuild’. Others say, ‘Oh, Adam Simpson is too loyal to these older blokes and should have got second-round picks for them’.

“So, what do you do?”

Cornes: “Well, the first point is Liam Baker will make his call. So that will be taken out of their hands.

“If he wants to go, he'll go. You offer him the contract. Clearly, you would love to keep him … but he's going to make that call.

“So then you do the best that you possibly can out of that (if he leaves).

“The Dustin Martin one is the really interesting one. He doesn't look as motivated as he has been in the past.

“You want to be really clear with him, ‘Are you prepared to put yourself through another pre-season and play in a side that is essentially rebuilding?’. Or, ‘Is this the right time to have the biggest victory lap you can have? Play your game 300, we’ll send you off in the way that you deserve to be sent off’. That's what I would be doing with Dustin.

“Is he helping them? Is he a Dyson Heppell type that you want in there showing leadership, rocking up to training, giving it absolutely everything, and setting a great example for all these young players that are going to be there?

“You've got to ask him that.”

King: “All that might be correct.

“But how do they get the glut of first-round picks that are needed? The absolute high-end first-round picks that are needed to give you any chance of coming out of a rebuild phase.”

Cornes: “So you look at who's got currency and who is potentially going to give you that. Dan Rioli has been spoken about - is he one that's going to give you a first-round pick? You have to look at that.

“You maximise what you can get for Baker. West Coast and Fremantle are stacked with picks.

“We don't need to be seeing (Marlion) Pickett and (Nathan) Broad and these players getting games over young players … like why are you playing Sam Naismith over Tyler Sonsie?

“That's just bizarre to me.”

King: “Let's talk about the rebuild phase, which I think is the toughest phase of the lot, how do you actually set for a rebuild? Do you purge rather than support?”

Cornes: “I'd purge as much as you can because you've got to look at it as a five to six-year window.

“It's not, ‘How do we get better?’, that’s not the discussion for Richmond.

“It’s, ‘We win four games this year, we get a top pick, then we trade a couple out, we get more picks and then you build and you play those games together over a five-year period’, that's the discussion they need to have.

“It's not going to be a rebound quickly up the ladder for Richmond … it’s going to be punishing.

“All Richmond fans can cop it because they've had the success and everyone would love to be in their position that they've seen that success in the last seven years it's been a great ride for them.

“Now it's about a bit of pain and enduring that.”

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/04/26/cornes-and-king-discuss-the-next-steps-in-richmonds-rebuild/

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2024, 11:24:56 AM »
like why are you playing Sam Naismith over Tyler Sonsie?

great call
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

FooffooValve

  • Guest
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2024, 11:32:42 AM »
like why are you playing Sam Naismith over Tyler Sonsie?

great call

Maybe because all our talls are injured?

Question should have been why are you playing Naismith over Ryan? That would actually make sense Corn.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9972
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2024, 11:39:21 AM »
He makes plenty of good points.

Only thing I would disagree with is trading D Rioli and I'm happy for broad to be in the side at the moment.

I'd be looking to trade Short and Graham. Baker if the right deal comes along.

Dusty looks finished to me.

Dusty, Lynch, Prestia, Grimes, Pickett, KMac, Broad all likely finished by the end of '25 so we are looking at $4.5mil cap space over two years.

Time to load up on picks and find 2 gun FAs.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40306
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2024, 01:26:04 PM »
like why are you playing Sam Naismith over Tyler Sonsie?

great call

Maybe because all our talls are injured?

Question should have been why are you playing Naismith over Ryan? That would actually make sense Corn.

 :clapping

Asking why a 206cm ruckman is playing ahead of a 181cm mid/HF is a silly question.

"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2024, 05:51:13 PM »
a 206 cm ruckman that is passed his use by date.

Not that stupid actually. Gawn dominated with 2 ruckman, and by some margin as well may i add.

Sonsie should have played with his form especially. Kane is spot on.







Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8093
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2024, 06:02:20 PM »
LMAO at posters acknowledging what a known richmond troll is saying about our list rebuild. Why don’t you wipe his bum too ya pack of sycophants!   :lol
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9972
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2024, 06:08:27 PM »
like why are you playing Sam Naismith over Tyler Sonsie?

great call

Maybe because all our talls are injured?

Question should have been why are you playing Naismith over Ryan? That would actually make sense Corn.

 :clapping

Asking why a 206cm ruckman is playing ahead of a 181cm mid/HF is a silly question.



Nank has gone largely solo against Gawn in the past with someone like Balta to relieve when Gawn isn't rucking and he's been serviceable.

The problem was that Naismith was probably always going to be useless unless he was rucking.

Should have played Ryan or just conceded the ruck when Nank was resting and played another mid.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40306
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2024, 08:40:31 PM »
a 206 cm ruckman that is passed his use by date.

Not that stupid actually. Gawn dominated with 2 ruckman, and by some margin as well may i add.

Sonsie should have played with his form especially. Kane is spot on.

If Cornes had asked why is Pickett or McIntosh playing ahead of Sonsie, then I'd say he's right

"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2024, 12:37:28 PM »
like why are you playing Sam Naismith over Tyler Sonsie?

great call

Maybe because all our talls are injured?

Question should have been why are you playing Naismith over Ryan? That would actually make sense Corn.
I agree but disagree. Yep our talls are injured or been badly out of form. Why not take it to the next step and play both Ryan as a permanent fwd and Naismith as the ruck fwd.What does it matter at this stage.

The one who is being over looked is Kaleb Smith.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2024, 01:16:08 PM »
 im in the same boat as most here and thought both Sonsie and McAuliffe should have got another game and in their right positions with good game time.

Im gunna play devils advocate here.
When you look at the three games Sonsie got then there was a strong case for him to be dropped. While he did some nice things  he didnt exactly set the world on fire. still he should have got one more.
The question has to be when will they give him a mid role that seems to be where he thrives. Surely he has to be a better option than Graham and a few others in that role..

McAuliffe again he showed the odd great glimpse with limited game time the trouble is he has not played much footy. came on as sub against the Saints and basically got a half against wce in a game we got badly beaten up in the midfield. Was a good opportunity to play him and Hopper in tandem imo. When Hopper went off we at least would have had a big body in there.

The two things that stick out to me is its obvious even our young bulls need big bodies to help them in games.
The other thing is he has not had a lot of game time since the start of the season. it makes no sense having dropped him if he is not injured to then rest him from the vfl.
On losing Hopper why not give Lefau a run thru the middle.

The one im more disappointed with is when Short got injured we had Kaleb Smith playing real well and he was an obvious like for like replacement across hb. Looks to have had another good game this week as well.

Big critic of Ryan will reserve comment on him until after he plays more senior games. Ludicrous given our tall situation that good vfl games were not rewarded with a recall.

Another week where all we can kick is 5 goals we need to do something different.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2024, 08:03:50 PM »
Wished Browny punched him in the head a bit harder

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2024, 09:24:36 PM »
King and  Cornes do not have Richmonds best interest at heart , they would be happy to see us as cellar dwellers for the next 30 years. To trade a good player who’s open to staying for a draft pick is a gamble , the list of duds our club has recruited in the last 20 years is amazing , it’s  hard to get a good one, even with all the research they put in.
I still remember when we had 5 picks in the first 20 picks , mmm how did that work out,

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2024, 11:55:41 PM »
You still need a core of top 10 picks to win flags - we had Cotchin (2), Martin(3) Vlastuin (9) ..got lucky that Riewoldt (12) & Rance (18) slid ...even the blokes we traded for were top 10 picks (Prestia & Caddy) and another in Lynch that like Riewoldt & Rance was a slider that would be rated top 5 if his draft was held again.....either they all went first round or end of first priority pick In Rance's case.....bottom line you need to draft & recruit the top line talent and you increase your chances the more high picks you have... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8093
Re: Cornes & King discuss the next steps in Richmond's rebuild (SEN)
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2024, 08:00:32 AM »
And that core need to be evenly spread across the ground. What makes Carlton so strong is that exact recipe couple with some clever trade/free agency selections. Gibcus, Balta and Taranto are an okay start…
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.