Author Topic: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?  (Read 1386 times)

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2024, 10:34:26 PM »
Jag Watts :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2024, 10:35:53 PM »
Draft Night:

FOS


Jack Ough


Gross


 :dancingpickle 


"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2024, 11:27:31 AM »
Really like the two big mids Lalor and Smillie nothing new there. Sid Draper and FOS seem like the best two of the smaller mids.Draper i like a hell of a lot as well.

Assuming we get pick 6 from GCS then im likely going  with the Dusty type in Lalor at 1 and hope like hell Draper is there at 6. I wish we had pick 4 that would solve the problem.
If it seems a good chance that Smillie or Lalor are there at 6 then id go the other way and take one of Draper or Fos at 1.


For me it is about judging who is most likely to be there  at six a big mid or a small mid.

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2437
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2024, 02:35:14 PM »
lol, doesn’t anyone think we need a key forward or three  :banghead

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2024, 03:42:16 PM »
lol, doesn’t anyone think we need a key forward or three  :banghead

Most of the best talent at the top end of this draft appears to be midfielders  but I'd be surprised if we don't grab one or two at some point - it's allegedly a deep draft....especially when the likes of O'Farrell & Gerryn are rated in the 30-50 range and the likes of Nichols even beyond that...I know we like Faull & Armstrong but I'd take Tauru before either...reckon they'll all be gone by the time we're finished with our primary midfield targets though ..latest word is that Tauru is rocketing up the charts with a bullet and Norf are even considering taking him with pick 2... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2437
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2024, 03:55:59 PM »
True , but we have a gaping hole and I’d be after the best key forward, trying to pick up good ones late is a recipe for average at best , If Ofarrell gets to the 20’s 30’s I’d grab him too , very good lock down Key back man  , we sure have a lot of  holes in our list.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2024, 04:06:40 PM »
True , but we have a gaping hole and I’d be after the best key forward, trying to pick up good ones late is a recipe for average at best , If Ofarrell gets to the 20’s 30’s I’d grab him too , very good lock down Key back man  , we sure have a lot of  holes in our list.

Only tall likely to go top 10 is a kpd. There will be plenty of opportunity to take tall forwards after that point  with the picks we are expected to have.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2024, 04:26:40 PM »
Gone off Ough - been very ordinary the CTL Granny... Hannaford looks a handy player... bit of an annoying little shyte who plays for and wins frees like Ginnivan - which is good when they're on your side... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2024, 04:29:09 PM »
Also absolutely have to bid on Ashcroft at pick 1 and make Bears pay- same goes for Marshall if we get the chance.... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2024, 04:33:01 PM »
True , but we have a gaping hole and I’d be after the best key forward, trying to pick up good ones late is a recipe for average at best , If Ofarrell gets to the 20’s 30’s I’d grab him too , very good lock down Key back man  , we sure have a lot of  holes in our list.

Floyd Burmeister another one - 199cm fwd/ruck - was good in the GF today in a losing side.... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4471
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2024, 05:02:58 PM »
We either need to bid on Ashcroft or have a one sided wink wink trade completed with the Lions

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9936
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2024, 05:34:19 PM »
Sydney doing fine with Amartey (rookie), Logan #4 and McLean PS Supp.

Think the clear learning here is that you just have to keep drafting talls every year, probably at least 1-2 forwards and 1-2 defenders.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8065
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #27 on: September 22, 2024, 08:31:27 AM »
Agreed Andyyyy and hit up free agency
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Number 1 pick - Who would you choose?
« Reply #28 on: September 22, 2024, 08:24:45 PM »
Have mentioned it  several times. We actually have very good numbers when it comes to key defenders and key forwards.
But having numbers and have the role covered are two different things.

With all things being equal we have our kpd's in place and they are damn good one's in Balta and Gibcus.
Its the lack of quality in the back up kpd's that is our problem. While it is not an urgent problem and does not need fixing this year with such a strong crop of mids to be had, a quality pick in coming years is needed imo.

Where we take players is relevant, Its indicative of quality. Saying that i  acknowledge it is not uncommon to find good ones with later picks. Later picks  tends to be a high turnover way to do it though.

Our kpd's and where they were originally taken. I think it does reflect the use of earlier picks to get quality and reflects what you get mostly with later picks.

Gibcus #9, Balta #25, Miller #63, Young (r), Blight (r) msd. The goal is to  replace one of the latter three with a quality pick or player. Just dont think we need to do it this year. If a real goodun is there and we rate him so be it. We will find out about Blight and we have some reasonable cover if the top 2 get hurt so its not urgent.

Key forward well that is another matter.

Lynch #11 and 32 yrs. Fawcett #43 19yo.  Koschitzke #52 and a stop gap, Lefau (r) ssp 26 yr old coming off a second knee. Gray (r) msd 21yo.

In all this at both ends we have a third tall type in Bauer another rookie msd pick.

Clearly we do not have Lynch's replacement and should have had him there three years ago developing. We also have not replaced Riewoldt looking for similar quality. While we do have good numbers, after 32 yr old Lynch we just do not have the quality.

I think we must target a kpf with one of the picks we will likely get in the 12 thru 17  range. If another rated one falls to our picks in the twenties then take one there as well.

We will have about 8 ND picks and all of them could be inside the top 30. Something like 1, 6, 9, 12, 13, 17, 20, 21, 29.
Optimistic maybe.

We are losing two quality players in Bolton and Rioli and imo we should be replacing them both with quality picks for players who play their roles.

Rioli well Travaglia at 9 there's a replacement for ya. Leaving us two options for the other hbf in Smith and maybe Trezise. could play Banks and Brown there as well.
 Bolton well do we want more a fwd or more of a mid?. One who would fit the bill would be Hotten at around pick 17. Pick 12 goes on Armstrong or the best Kpf available. 1 and 6 goes on the two best mids available.It still leaves us with good picks and options.

Pickett is gone and McIntosh won't be too far behind him so lets target a quality wingman who offers more than both.

The opportunity is there to not only target best available but its so even on talent serious list needs as well.