Author Topic: Rookie Draft  (Read 4310 times)

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2644
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #45 on: November 21, 2025, 03:35:13 PM »
I don’t understand why our club would leave Kellaway hanging .
An explanation is needed , otherwise it comes across as disrespectful to the Kellaways 

Offline ajGreen

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #46 on: November 21, 2025, 03:44:56 PM »
I don’t understand why our club would leave Kellaway hanging .
An explanation is needed , otherwise it comes across as disrespectful to the Kellaways

The only reason could be. There are not convinced he is good enough?

Seems pretty harsh taking all of his mates.

There is one spot left on the list I think b(and 1 catB which he isn't eligabe for).

So maybe they have him as a train on? Going for the last position

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11434
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #47 on: November 21, 2025, 03:47:24 PM »
The fact we didn't even give him a rookie change is...quite poor IMO.

I'm not sure I've seen any club with a F/S option late in the draft not at least give them two years to have a crack?

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5394
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #48 on: November 21, 2025, 04:12:51 PM »
Archie Daffy shaking in his boots right now.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5255
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #49 on: November 21, 2025, 04:24:48 PM »
I don’t understand why our club would leave Kellaway hanging .
An explanation is needed , otherwise it comes across as disrespectful to the Kellaways

LOL .. an explanation is needed? Why?
I'm sure they have had constant communication with the Kellaway family and find it highly unlikely they would have disrespected them in this process.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5255
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #50 on: November 21, 2025, 04:30:08 PM »
Archie Daffy shaking in his boots right now.

Doesn't he look like a better prospect?

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5394
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #51 on: November 21, 2025, 04:52:59 PM »
Archie Daffy shaking in his boots right now.

Doesn't he look like a better prospect?

No idea tbh. I actually thought kellaway looked like a good prospect and he couldn’t even get a rookie spot in a weak draft. He was extremely consistent, averaged 19 with a dominant SA winning the national championship and 24 with Sturt which he won the U18 premiership with.

Offline Buddysucks

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #52 on: November 21, 2025, 05:24:48 PM »
17 other clubs had the chance to draft him and passed so one has to assume he’s not viewed as AFL standard.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4051
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #53 on: November 21, 2025, 05:25:32 PM »
Back the club in and recruitment team let's not recruit players because of romance. He may be one of 3 players to push fro that rookie spot on a train on list.

Offline OneEyedRichmond

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #54 on: November 21, 2025, 05:54:11 PM »
The fact we didn't even give him a rookie change is...quite poor IMO.

I'm not sure I've seen any club with a F/S option late in the draft not at least give them two years to have a crack?

The pies say hold my beer… McGuane

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2644
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #55 on: November 21, 2025, 06:03:36 PM »
Hard for some to understand but Richmond just cant be up front and not nominate a player if they don’t intend to take him. To give someone hope and then tell them we’ve changed our mind and think that’s ok tells you a lot about those people.

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8797
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #56 on: November 21, 2025, 06:20:06 PM »
Neither Collingwopd nor Richmond promised either player they would be drafted.
It is harsh but list spots are a premium and we cannot afford to stuff any up.
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3957
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #57 on: November 21, 2025, 06:22:17 PM »
I guess club were not prepared to take a risk on Kellaway which is ashame
« Last Edit: November 22, 2025, 07:12:42 AM by eliminator »

Offline ajGreen

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #58 on: November 21, 2025, 06:33:54 PM »
A lot of people upset in tigers land but I don't mind it.


NHH
Oudshoorn-Bennier
Tom McGuane
Tom Burton
Rory Wright

Etc. can be invited to train for the last spot.

Harsh and not very romantic to kellaway but ruthless and bold by the club.

Like others have said he is objectively not good enough at this stage unfortunately. Proven by being passed on by the league in two drafts.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5255
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #59 on: November 21, 2025, 08:08:34 PM »
Hard for some to understand but Richmond just cant be up front and not nominate a player if they don’t intend to take him. To give someone hope and then tell them we’ve changed our mind and think that’s ok tells you a lot about those people.

Ever thought they might have taken him if they didn’t get another kid they had earmarked for the spot?

Eg, if we don’t get player xxx in the draft, we will take Kellaway.

He would have been told clearly there is no promises.