But futile.
He has stated he wants to win games of footy.
We have cobbled together recent history’s greatest collection of losers off field to drag the players down to their level - either through getting injured or having the life sucked out of them with coaching ineptitude.
Let off the cliff by a CEO who thinks our injuries are bad luck after having so many injuries last year we used 40 players - only exceeded by Essington. 
Talks cheap.
Richmond should have the capacity to offer him stupid money, front ended.
Mates with lalor too.
What happens when other players contracts are up and they request ridiculous money to resign or when we are trying to lure other high profile F/A and they point to this deal and say they want around the same ball park?
I’m not convinced contracts of this length and $$$ will work with the current cap even considering the gradual rise year on year, would like to see it successfully implemented elsewhere before offering such things. Not sure how st kilda will manage but atleast NAS’ deal is only for 2 years, the TDK one being long term I expect to backfire.
Also I know he’ll only be 26 at the start of next season but I’m not sure his age profile aligns with where we currently are. In terms of high profile F/A I reckon we are better served waiting a couple more seasons so that they will be around the same age as our draft crop.
Agree with most on here that it’s a moot point as he could just stay at port for a similar amount or head to another vic club that is currently contending if he wants to accept a hair cut.
I certainly would not entertain him if port want to match an offer and force a trade. Would need to give up all our early picks this and next season unless he’s willing to walk to the draft.