« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks  (Read 7168 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« on: July 17, 2004, 03:18:28 AM »
Not complaining but today's listed team must be one of the youngest Tiger sides to run out since the late 80's/early 90's. Well at least for a bloody long time.

B: A.Kellaway (28), Jackson (18), Zantuck (22)
HB: Newman (22), Hall (23), Fiora (23)
C: Roach (18), Bowden (26), Pettifer (22)
HF: Tivendale (25), Schulz (19), Hartigan (19)
F: Krakouer (21), Richardson (29), Moore (20)
FOLL: Ottens (24), Johnson (26), Brown (27)
I/C: Hyde (21), Tuck (22), Fleming (26), Blumfield (26)

Average Age: 22.89 years - starting 18
                    23.05 years - whole 22
Logged
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2011, 12:07:12 AM »
jacko full back.
Same old Newman.
Moore forward line.
Tucky super sub.

TheAv age side vs freo.  23 1 month.

Quote from: mightytiges on July 17, 2004, 03:18:28 AM
Not complaining but today's listed team must be one of the youngest Tiger sides to run out since the late 80's/early 90's. Well at least for a bloody long time.

B: A.Kellaway (28), Jackson (18), Zantuck (22)
HB: Newman (22), Hall (23), Fiora (23)
C: Roach (18), Bowden (26), Pettifer (22)
HF: Tivendale (25), Schulz (19), Hartigan (19)
F: Krakouer (21), Richardson (29), Moore (20)
FOLL: Ottens (24), Johnson (26), Brown (27)
I/C: Hyde (21), Tuck (22), Fleming (26), Blumfield (26)

Average Age: 22.89 years - starting 18
                    23.05 years - whole 22

Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2011, 12:21:19 AM »
Quote from: mightytiges on July 17, 2004, 03:18:28 AM
Not complaining but today's listed team must be one of the youngest Tiger sides to run out since the late 80's/early 90's. Well at least for a bloody long time.

B: A.Kellaway (28), Jackson (18), Zantuck (22)
HB: Newman (22), Hall (23), Fiora (23)
C: Roach (18), Bowden (26), Pettifer (22)
HF: Tivendale (25), Schulz (19), Hartigan (19)
F: Krakouer (21), Richardson (29), Moore (20)
FOLL: Ottens (24), Johnson (26), Brown (27)
I/C: Hyde (21), Tuck (22), Fleming (26), Blumfield (26)

Average Age: 22.89 years - starting 18
                    23.05 years - whole 22


God, could we have fit anymore losers into one team... :lol
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Ox

  • Guest
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2011, 12:52:43 AM »
A.Kellaway (28), :banghead
Zantuck (22) :banghead :banghead
Hall (23) :banghead
Fiora (23) :banghead :banghead
C: Roach (18),  :banghead :banghead
Bowden (26),  :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Pettifer (22) :banghead :banghead
Tivendale  :banghead :banghead :banghead
Hartigan (19) :banghead :banghead :banghead
Johnson (26) :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Hyde (21) :banghead :banghead
Fleming (26),  :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Blumfield (26) :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead

Thats stuffing poohouse
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 02:21:35 AM by one-eyed »
Logged

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2011, 06:46:40 AM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on May 12, 2011, 12:52:43 AM
A.Kellaway (28), :banghead
Zantuck (22) :banghead :banghead
Hall (23) :banghead
Fiora (23) :banghead :banghead
C: Roach (18),  :banghead :banghead
Bowden (26),  :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Pettifer (22) :banghead :banghead
Tivendale  :banghead :banghead :banghead
Hartigan (19) :banghead :banghead :banghead
Johnson (26) :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Hyde (21) :banghead :banghead
Fleming (26),  :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Blumfield (26) :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead

Thats effing poohouse

Bowden was a great player and would have been a legend in any other team. So was Wayne Campbell but did you dislike him too?
Logged
The club that keeps giving.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2011, 06:57:36 AM »
Is tivendale okay? Heard he was seriously injured on weekend. Johnson, Kellaway and Bowden were very good players for us.
Logged

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2011, 10:26:08 AM »
Quote from: mightytiges on July 17, 2004, 03:18:28 AM
B: A.Kellaway (28), Jackson (18), Zantuck (22)
HB: Newman (22), Hall (23), Fiora (23)
C: Roach (18), Bowden (26), Pettifer (22)
HF: Tivendale (25), Schulz (19), Hartigan (19)
F: Krakouer (21), Richardson (29), Moore (20)
FOLL: Ottens (24), Johnson (26), Brown (27)
I/C: Hyde (21), Tuck (22), Fleming (26), Blumfield (26)

just vomited in my mouth
Logged

Offline dizza

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2011, 11:04:43 AM »
Quote from: WA Tiger on May 12, 2011, 12:21:19 AM
Quote from: mightytiges on July 17, 2004, 03:18:28 AM
Not complaining but today's listed team must be one of the youngest Tiger sides to run out since the late 80's/early 90's. Well at least for a bloody long time.

B: A.Kellaway (28), Jackson (18), Zantuck (22)
HB: Newman (22), Hall (23), Fiora (23)
C: Roach (18), Bowden (26), Pettifer (22)
HF: Tivendale (25), Schulz (19), Hartigan (19)
F: Krakouer (21), Richardson (29), Moore (20)
FOLL: Ottens (24), Johnson (26), Brown (27)
I/C: Hyde (21), Tuck (22), Fleming (26), Blumfield (26)

Average Age: 22.89 years - starting 18
                    23.05 years - whole 22


God, could we have fit anymore losers into one team... :lol

We hadn't drafted JON yet...
Logged
Push up!

Ox

  • Guest
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2011, 12:53:57 PM »
Quote from: Mr Tigra on May 12, 2011, 06:46:40 AM
Quote from: []())([]™ on May 12, 2011, 12:52:43 AM
A.Kellaway (28), :banghead
Zantuck (22) :banghead :banghead
Hall (23) :banghead
Fiora (23) :banghead :banghead
C: Roach (18),  :banghead :banghead
Bowden (26),  :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Pettifer (22) :banghead :banghead
Tivendale  :banghead :banghead :banghead
Hartigan (19) :banghead :banghead :banghead
Johnson (26) :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Hyde (21) :banghead :banghead
Fleming (26),  :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead
Blumfield (26) :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead

Thats effing poohouse

Bowden was a great player and would have been a legend in any other team. So was Wayne Campbell but did you dislike him too?

Bowden was a two faced coward who shirked HBGs.
Even took the game into disrepute by abusing the scoring system in yet another cowardly act of boldness - lol
Why do u think Rawlings basically put him into early retirement?
Hmmm-we dont talk about that too much,Do we.?
Bowden was at the crest of thinking he as bigger than the club on top of which he was a total effing dud and hypocrite suCking dog.

ANYTHING ELSE??


Campbell>>>>>>>>>bowden
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 01:03:16 PM by one-eyed »
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #9 on: May 12, 2011, 12:56:59 PM »
Quote from: eliminator on May 12, 2011, 06:57:36 AM
Is tivendale okay? Heard he was seriously injured on weekend. Johnson, Kellaway and Bowden were very good players for us.

LMAOOOOOOOO

« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 01:02:50 PM by one-eyed »
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2011, 01:08:18 PM »
I'll pay someone to argue about Bowden and Johsnon with me
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2011, 01:12:43 PM »
anybody.......................
Logged

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #12 on: May 12, 2011, 01:15:39 PM »
Joel or Patrick?
Logged

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #13 on: May 12, 2011, 02:15:37 PM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on May 12, 2011, 01:12:43 PM
anybody.......................
Bowden was better than Johnson  :cheers :birthday
Logged

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: This would have to be our youngest team in yonks
« Reply #14 on: May 12, 2011, 02:18:45 PM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on May 12, 2011, 01:08:18 PM
I'll pay someone to argue about Bowden and Johsnon with me
How much?  :lol
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »