be nice please and stick to the subject
you still havent come up with a serviceable pick 94 yet
Dean cox, Nathan Foley, Nick Maxwell, Tom Rockcliff, Leigh Adams, Matt Suckling, Paul Duffield, Heath Hocking, Aaron Davey, Andrew Carrazzo.........all picks 94 and above and there just off he top of my head! Would you like me to fully research it for you?
you name the successes, now name the over 1000 failures with rookie picks. i reckon most successful rookie picks would be mature picks as well.
i will say again late nd and rookie picks are a numbers game where you turn over heaps ( about 6 ) in the hope of finding one decent player who can do a job for you.
just my opinion but with these picks we would be better off with a mixture of kids and mature recruits about 50/50. someone like moloney would be a guarantee of decent service for two or three yrs. most rookies dont ever get to play a senior game.
What's that got to do with O'Hanlon and in turn why is O'Hanlon being discussed in the McGuane thread?
why is ohanlon being discussed here you will have to ask others i didnt bring him up.
what has the above got to do with ohanlon. well someone asked how many pick 94s have made it i was just making the point that the vast majority of picks taken at 94 or later do not make it.
if we use previous history as a guide there should not be high expectations on the kid.
as for mcguane did i mention hes a hack? oh yeah i did.