Author Topic: campbell v sugar  (Read 4557 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58582
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #15 on: April 16, 2007, 04:16:46 PM »
That may be so about Cambo X but some supporters never forgave him. I can still remember a supporter in the RFC members a few years ago, after we had just kicked a goal thanks to a smart lobbed kick by Cambo to one of our leading forwards, remaining arms crossed and turning to his mate next to him saying "typical Campbell kicking short up and unders, that's why I've never liked him"  ::).

Knights was a great player (moreso before and including '95) but we never made the finals either under his captaincy.

I seriously believe we could make anyone captain and they would get bagged by our own supporters. Team depth especially quality ballwinning onballers is something we have always lacked and still do. Too much left to too few. That's not the captain's fault that's the recruiter's job. Right now our older starting midfielders are just B-graders at best and below them are our young blokes still learning the caper. One top player isn't going to solve our deficiencies. If we somehow got Judd and made him captain little would change IMO.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline JohnF

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1514
  • ROFLMAO
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2007, 04:32:46 PM »
Even Cambo ended up being schhit as captain. The difference was though that he was shot at the time, whereas Johnson is meant to be in the prime of his career.

I thought Cambo was out best player in 2001 ( not Gaspar ), he was second in the league in clearances and was doing a lot of hard things, somewhat unsual for him. 2002 he was ok, playing injured half the year and still pulled off some inspirational performances, notably against West Coast (36 touches, 4 goals) and Melbourne (17 touches and a goal in last quarter) to win games off his own boot. In 2003 he started of great, and was miles ahead of anyone in our B&F until he did his achilles. After that he was history and we, following him, went to total scchit.

Johnson looks to be playing injured to me. He is so slow it's glaring. But I don't want to attribute everything to injury, for even when he does get the ball he makes as stupid errors as you'd see from a first gamer. IMO he never has had and never will have the footy nous of someone like cambo, both as a player and as a captain. He seems no more tactically aware than Luke McGuane.

   

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2007, 04:57:34 PM »
That may be so about Cambo X but some supporters never forgave him. I can still remember a supporter in the RFC members a few years ago, after we had just kicked a goal thanks to a smart lobbed kick by Cambo to one of our leading forwards, remaining arms crossed and turning to his mate next to him saying "typical Campbell kicking short up and unders, that's why I've never liked him"  ::).

Knights was a great player (moreso before and including '95) but we never made the finals either under his captaincy.

I seriously believe we could make anyone captain and they would get bagged by our own supporters. Team depth especially quality ballwinning onballers is something we have always lacked and still do. Too much left to too few. That's not the captain's fault that's the recruiter's job. Right now our older starting midfielders are just B-graders at best and below them are our young blokes still learning the caper. One top player isn't going to solve our deficiencies. If we somehow got Judd and made him captain little would change IMO.

I understand what you are saying MT, but I'm comenting on his playing ability.  Had he'd not been captain I'd still say he's a hack and be calling for his axing.  He's basically a blonde version of Mathew Rogers (geez I couldn't stand him).  He has little awareness, vision, and footy smarts.  He's a first otion type player and if the first option isn't glaringly obvious he'll take the easy option and blaze away anywhere.  IMO he is one of the most overrated players in the league.

You cannot compare him to Campbell because, even though Campbells kicking let him down alot, he was still smart enough to find the hard and loose ball and he was great in getting his teamates into the game by hand.  Wasn't the biggest fan of Campbell but had respect for him as a player. 
Does anyone have half an idea on anything?

Offline JohnF

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1514
  • ROFLMAO
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2007, 05:09:01 PM »
ROFLAMOOOO@Rogers. Trust Harry to bring old hand grenade back to discussion. Funny carrnt.You're right though, Johnson is turning into Rogers mach II. Rogers could still be playing today given the standard we are setting.

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2007, 06:04:04 PM »
Knights was a champion.

Campbell was a good player.

Johnson is a hack.

I don't know about a hack.
I think my non tiger friend sums him up perfectly- 'he was good for Adelaide, has only been OK for Richmond'

In an ideal world, your captain wouldn't be OK. He'd be a gun!
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Ox

  • Guest
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2007, 06:40:40 PM »
Rogers was better than Johnson at Richmond.

LMAO@ Rogers being our captain

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3914
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2007, 11:00:28 PM »
Took your time to get back here John.

WP - I'd rather beans than brussell sprouts  :chuck

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40032
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #22 on: April 17, 2007, 09:08:32 AM »
WP - I'd rather beans than brussell sprouts  :chuck

 ;D :thumbsup

Personally I prefer peas  ;)
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3914
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #23 on: April 17, 2007, 10:32:28 AM »
Yeah me too - especially mint peas.

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #24 on: April 17, 2007, 10:41:17 AM »
Took your time to get back here John.

On Skippy they whistle with a gumleaf.
On OER they whistle with a Campbell.
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58582
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #25 on: April 17, 2007, 12:59:29 PM »
Took your time to get back here John.

On Skippy they whistle with a gumleaf.
On OER they whistle with a Campbell.

:lol

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: What's that Cambo?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: There's a problem at Punt Rd?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: They're talking about you on OER?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: I'll be right there
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3914
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #26 on: April 17, 2007, 02:10:05 PM »
LOL

Offline Stephanie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • I am from Tigerland!
    • My Myspace
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #27 on: April 17, 2007, 03:13:47 PM »
Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: What's that Cambo?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: There's a problem at Punt Rd?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: They're talking about you on OER?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: I'll be right there

Lol, that's gold. :ROTFL
On victory we strive. Eat 'em alive!

Offline JohnF

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1514
  • ROFLMAO
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #28 on: April 17, 2007, 04:00:21 PM »
Took your time to get back here John.

On Skippy they whistle with a gumleaf.
On OER they whistle with a Campbell.

:lol

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: What's that Cambo?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: There's a problem at Punt Rd?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: They're talking about you on OER?

Cambo: tsk tsk tsk

JohnF: I'll be right there


ROFLAMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooo  :bow

Moi

  • Guest
Re: campbell v sugar
« Reply #29 on: April 17, 2007, 04:15:45 PM »
 :bow MT  :bow