Ok - if they say it wasn't deliberate and therefore an accident but what about reckless?
I don’t know if it makes a difference how they word the charge WP, but I think Farmer was on a charge of “misconduct”, so would it have made any difference if the charge contained the term “reckless act”?
It doesn’t seem to matter how you think about this though, he should have got weeks.
I didn’t think his intention was to do that sort of damage, but thought the reason he would get weeks was because it was a reckless act. I can’t see, no matter which angle you look at it from, how he could get off without a penalty, because it was reckless.
Danny Williams must be regretting the fact that he has to face the NRL judiciary, instead of the AFL tribunal system. He’d be back playing this weekend, you’d think.