Well MT, I ask this, why pick him this week for ?
good question jack
now i have no idea about what goes on behind teh scenes at afl clubs, you have a much greater understanding than me.
this is just my answer to your question and are my thoughts only.
maybe gaspar was selected to play and told it would be his send off and last game for the club and he would finish his career at the burger. now he said he was a proud man( i have no idea why, he sure as hell dosnt play like a proud man) and we all know he is a quiet type, thus he may have said thanks but no thanks, i wont play as of now.
so if he objected to a send off aka chubba, thats poor form.
however , we should be rejoicing . At least week in week out from now on the club wont have to select a player who plays, gives us the impression that he plays the game with no desire, no heart , no interest and poor skill.
its now one less dud we have to worry about.
i would rather lose by a few goals week in week out with moore, thursty, mguane, polak etc getting goals kicked on them than gaspar. at least the other blokes will learn from their experiences, gaspar, like tivendale wont learn anything else, and wont improve.
this way we are giving the kids game time and show us b/w now and rnd 22 if they can/have/havent improved.
i dont know why clubs have to be moral, why should they. players leave clubs , look at aker, browny, otto , stevens etc. when players dont leave on moral grounds we crack the nanas, so if its ok for players to shaft clubs, its ok for clubs to shaft players.
what gets up my nose, is why didnt terry just get rid of these blokes, gas, chubba, tiv, staff, chaff etc, as soon as he arrived. it woudl have meant 2 more wooden spoons or very low finishes and 2 more yrs of very handy picks.
these sackings/retirements/ droppings(tiv/krak etc) are 2 yrs too late