Why Kingsley may play this week

[mightytiges]

Kingsley always has played his best games against the Bombers. He's averaged 3.6 goals, 13 possies and 5.6 marks and kicked 3.2, 3.2, 7.0, 2.0, 6.3, 4.2 in his last 6 games against them since 2002.

Also as Ox pointed out in another thread, we may go with Kingsley to add experience up forward in the absence of Richo.

Be prepared to be outraged Thursday night if Kingsley is brought in lol.

[Life goes on]

will be a slaughter if he plays

[DallasCrane]

Be prepared to be outraged Thursday night if Kingsley is brought in lol.

I won't be! I think he is the perfect replacement for Richo, although it would be good to see Schulz with a bit of space in the f50.

[bluey_21]

                                                            
                                                             
                                                              
                                                              
                                                
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
                                                

[bluey_21]

lol it didn't work 

[Stephanie]

Lol I knew what you meant 

[GoKent!]

why does Kent get continually bagged when he has not done a thing wrong. i hope he plays and kicks a bag , that may shut some of you people up

[Fishfinger]

Guilty until proven innocent, so it seems.
I hope he gets a chance to defend himself soon.

[Ox]

I Love him and want him to have my cubs.

[Stephanie]

why does Kent get continually bagged when he has not done a thing wrong. i hope he plays and kicks a bag , that may shut some of you people up

So do I, I hope he kicks a bag and I get proven wrong.

Lol Ox

[Life goes on]

why does Kent get continually bagged when he has not done a thing wrong. i hope he plays and kicks a bag , that may shut some of you people up

Welcome to OER GoKent.
Happy posting.
Are you his sister ?

[bluey_21]

I don't like Kent, just my opinion. Just doesn't impress me. On the weekend he may have kicked a bag but they were all gift goals that he didn't have to work for.

Also him playing would be a complete contradiction to where we want to be. Playing him would just set back the development of another tall 

[Ox]

I don't like Kent, just my opinion. Just doesn't impress me. On the weekend he may have kicked a bag but they were all gift goals that he didn't have to work for.

Also him playing would be a complete contradiction to where we want to be. Playing him would just set back the development of another tall 

well why did we get him then.

Jack and Kentleigh to come in.

[bluey_21]

I don't like Kent, just my opinion. Just doesn't impress me. On the weekend he may have kicked a bag but they were all gift goals that he didn't have to work for.

Also him playing would be a complete contradiction to where we want to be. Playing him would just set back the development of another tall 

well why did we get him then.

that would be my question as well, watching the Burgers vs Tassie game was vindication for me.

Tom Collier played a super game down back, and he could be at punt road, but then we choose Kent   

[crackertiger]

I think Kent should definately come in. We do need an older, wiser, and more experienced player to help Reiwoldt, Schulz and Hughes. They will need him there just for presence sake! If he kicks a few goals then great. If he doesn't the younger forwards will walk taller around him just because he's there. It's a win win situation.

Kingsley playing forward will get Mal Michael. Schulz/Hughes will probably get the Fletcher making it easier for Reiwoldt to debut.


One player being Hughes or Schulz will miss out, but thats ok, they will get another opertunity sooner rather than later.