Author Topic: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once  (Read 3620 times)

Bulluss

  • Guest
Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« on: June 30, 2007, 10:30:37 PM »
Wallace is far too one dimensional and doesnt try players in various spots to get them into the game.

Perfect example tonight was Lids. Why wouldnt he try and move him up the ground on a wing or HF to try and get him into the game.

Key back match-ups were wrong, as were most of the midfield match ups.

The only things he constantly tried to do was get Polak free down back.

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2007, 10:45:35 PM »
I only have one question was why they played Raines on Riewoldt.
Still scratching my head on that one

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2007, 11:18:55 PM »
We're Tanking!  :shh
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2007, 11:38:40 PM »

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2007, 08:08:31 AM »
I only have one question was why they played Raines on Riewoldt.
Still scratching my head on that one

Because Terry Wallace mighten have much idea.
Raines on Riewoldt ::)
And fancy putting Tivendale on Gram, lol
Tambling should have gone to Montagna
And Jackson defensive shut down role on Gram.
Gram is a gun
To say we were tanking is a joke. Why play Simmonds if they were tanking, get real!

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2007, 08:19:21 AM »
We're not tanking, we're experimenting :shh
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

Offline bluey_21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Road Runner
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2007, 08:24:32 AM »
We're not tanking, we're experimenting :shh

exactly  :shh

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2007, 08:43:33 AM »
I absolutely hate all this talk about tanking.  The AFL should penalise teams for tanking, not reward them.  Any team that tanks should be droped to the VFL - don't deserve to play senior football.

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2007, 09:16:26 AM »
Can assure you that the tiges arent tanking

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2007, 10:43:51 AM »
Can assure you that the tiges arent tanking

how can you assure us jackstar

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2007, 07:30:47 PM »
I absolutely hate all this talk about tanking.  The AFL should penalise teams for tanking, not reward them.  Any team that tanks should be droped to the VFL - don't deserve to play senior football.
Tanking not in the literal sense that you stop trying but more not giving the team the best possible chance to win by experimenting for the benefit of 2008 and beyond. Simmo was nowhere fit. He didn't even start in the ruck when he is clearly our 1st ruck and Patto isn't.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2007, 06:58:23 AM »
Can assure you that the tiges arent tanking

how can you assure us jackstar

yes jackstar , assure us, just like sheedy never tanked last year!!!

can assure you jack, sheedy is the one who should be worried, another very very very lucky win with an old aging list

ok we lost to the saints, we tanked it by playing key players out of position, but we played are far better style and hame than the bombers.

if u were an impartial supporter on sat night you would have sat there and watched a pretty damn good game of footy

but assure us, stand up and deliver, stop popping ur head in here every time we lose and assure us terry is gone and we are sh it bla bla bla

make ur point, back it up , BE A MAN


Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #12 on: July 02, 2007, 07:04:05 AM »
Richmond needs to tank this year and probably next as well to do this properly. 1 17 18 34 or picks thereabouts  is what we need.

Picks 1 2 18 34 next year would finish the job.


Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2007, 08:20:52 AM »
Is tanking really the answer?  Doesn't seem to have done any good for Carlton.

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Why doesnt Wallace try something different for once
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2007, 08:44:03 AM »
Can assure you that the tiges arent tanking

how can you assure us jackstar

yes jackstar , assure us, just like sheedy never tanked last year!!!

can assure you jack, sheedy is the one who should be worried, another very very very lucky win with an old aging list

ok we lost to the saints, we tanked it by playing key players out of position, but we played are far better style and hame than the bombers.

if u were an impartial supporter on sat night you would have sat there and watched a pretty damn good game of footy

but assure us, stand up and deliver, stop popping ur head in here every time we lose and assure us terry is gone and we are sh it bla bla bla

make ur point, back it up , BE A MAN



Sat behind you actually
Ailse 11, level 2.?
Thought we will extremely well coached against Melbourne, and poorly coached on sat night.
If you think Cam Howat on harvey is a good match up?  ::)
Raines on Riedwoldt ::)
Tivendale on Gram ::)