Author Topic: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw  (Read 5941 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98458
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« on: July 15, 2007, 05:13:05 PM »
Walls and Shaw are going to town on us on 3aw. Saying we haven't improved in 3 years, we have no youngsters to take us to a higher level and become 200 game players for us, Foley and King work their guts out but will they take you to another level, Rainesy is no longer a youngster so he doesn't count, Polak gets the easiest job in footy playing as a loose man.


Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2007, 05:17:01 PM »
Would think that Edwards and Foley is where we need to start.. We can build a future on them 2 , no doubt
Have been listerning to Tony Shaw and I reckon he nearly  on the money.
Tony Shaw tipped us for the spoon at the start of the year as he is no doubt aware of the problems with the current list and the overall game plan.
now what did happen to the 100 points a game and the run and carry gamplan ? thrown right out the door never to return

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2007, 05:18:46 PM »
deledio ring a bell????

patto has showed alot thi syr

edwards

and even though he is being bagged blingers is a 200 gamer and so is thursty

walls and shaw can eat my turds

1965

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2007, 05:20:24 PM »

walls and shaw can eat my turds

I can't imagine a worse punishment.

 :help

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2007, 05:23:43 PM »
Amazing people bagging Walls and Shaw.
 Both Premierships Captains and Walls coach, they must have some idea you would think..  No thye have no idea, people who write on forums have a much better idea about football, sorry i forgot :shh

1965

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2007, 05:28:02 PM »
Amazing people bagging Walls and Shaw.
 Both Premierships Captains and Walls coach, they must have some idea you would think..  No thye have no idea, people who write on forums have a much better idea about football, sorry i forgot :shh

Does this include you?

God you are a sanctimonious twit.

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2007, 05:41:31 PM »
Amazing people bagging Walls and Shaw.
 Both Premierships Captains and Walls coach, they must have some idea you would think..  No thye have no idea, people who write on forums have a much better idea about football, sorry i forgot :shh

Does this include you?

God you are a sanctimonious twit.

Hey 1965, I am not the one bagging Walls or Shaw.
You are.
Would think there opinions are bascially right, if you dont like the truth, thats your problem pal.
And furthermore, I am a Richmond supporter and have been all my life.
I dont think the current gameplan and list management are working.
As for on field performance, we have gone backwards and thats a fact.
The recruiting has been terrible since Plough took over. Every clubs would have picked Lids at Pick 1 so whoppe Do. The problems was with the picks afterwards and has been very other year. e.g/ Jarrod Oakley Nichols, Meyer etc etc
As Ramps says, you might find the ""honeymoon"" period  will be over at years end and hard decsions will be delivered by the commitee.
2011  is looking like 2015 at this rate.

1965

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2007, 05:49:43 PM »
Amazing people bagging Walls and Shaw.
 Both Premierships Captains and Walls coach, they must have some idea you would think..  No thye have no idea, people who write on forums have a much better idea about football, sorry i forgot :shh

Does this include you?

God you are a sanctimonious twit.

Hey 1965, I am not the one bagging Walls or Shaw.


Get your facts right.

I didn't bag Walls or Shaw.

That was someone else.

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2007, 05:55:11 PM »
deledio ring a bell????

patto has showed alot thi syr

edwards

and even though he is being bagged blingers is a 200 gamer and so is thursty

walls and shaw can eat my turds
Spot on.
Show me a club where every recruit has turned into a superstar and I'll eat your turds, X lol
These jerks in Shaw and Walls change their mind every week depending on which way the wind is blowing.
We have a good game, we've got great youngsters.
We get beaten by a more experienced, bigger unit who've reaped the benefits of tanking for a few years, while we tried to remain competitive and suddenly our kids are shiit  ::)
We've got some good ones coming through, but if we had have tanked like they did, we would probably be in a better position now.
But the Richmond supporters went, over my dead body should we tank.  So we get the draft picks that we've got.
And the blind, biased, anti-Wallace, anti-Richmond theorists will take advantage of that.
Someone please tell me that they would have preferred to have the list we had three years ago and kept on topping up?  Or did they prefer we took this direction, getting rid of players that were going nowhere (90% of the list) knowing that not every selection we picked was going to be a superstar, but was better than sticking with the players we had at the time.
The trouble is, as the year goes on, I think we'll see probably worse performances.  Those that have carried us this year have pretty young legs.  Some of them have been extraordinary in the way they've gone about it, but there are limits.
At least give these kids a few more years before bringing out the knives.  They don't deserve it in what they've given this year.  Save it for those that should be playing better that ain't!

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2007, 05:56:58 PM »
How many rising star nominations have we got this year people?

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2007, 05:58:43 PM »
your theory Moi goes straight out the window.
Kent Kingsley and Mark Grahram.
Forgot Paddy Bowden ::)

And the ins next week will be Kingsley, Bowden and Krak ::)

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2007, 06:02:44 PM »
your theory Moi goes straight out the window.
Kent Kingsley and Mark Grahram.
Forgot Paddy Bowden ::)

And the ins next week will be Kingsley, Bowden and Krak ::)

And you want the King of Recruiting Recycled Hacks to coach our club!
Think of your own theories!

Offline harry bosch

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2007, 07:36:35 PM »
Raines is 21 this year he is a youngster , more so than king and foley(23 and 22)

As for his overall comment absolute rubbish , while our recruiting has been disappointing to suggest we have no 200 game youngster is rubbish..

The guy is an oxygen thief...


Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2007, 07:41:19 PM »
your theory Moi goes straight out the window.
Kent Kingsley and Mark Grahram.
Forgot Paddy Bowden ::)

And the ins next week will be Kingsley, Bowden and Krak ::)

And you want the King of Recruiting Recycled Hacks to coach our club!
Think of your own theories!

Thats not point, This has nothing to do with anyone esle but Terry wallace. Dont deflect Moi
. Should of been a youth policy from the day he walked into the place ala Alistair Clarkson
Hawks are miles ahead of us.- and there recruits are good. They are mostly strong bigger build players, not the light weights we have recruited
2011 is more like 2015

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: Richmond has no 200 game youngsters - Tony Shaw
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2007, 09:15:39 PM »
How many rising star nominations have we got this year people?


NIL