Author Topic: Sugar in strife doing a Fev / Out of North game plus $5,000 fine  (Read 16192 times)

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #105 on: March 24, 2008, 01:03:54 PM »
If it was Bucks who had done it in Licuria's time then he'd be the type of person to hand over the captaincy to Clement.

Yeah, just like he handed it over after smearing blood on Ling.
Get off the grass, Paul.
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sugar out of North game plus a $5,000 fine
« Reply #106 on: March 24, 2008, 02:22:36 PM »
ideal opportunity to strip him of his captainancy.
Captains lead by example.
Club should make an example of him and therfore ingrain a hard culture at the club, but no, it wont happen.
Fine him a few dollars and they will say we are all moving forward.
Any joy from last thursdays win has quickly been taken away >:(

you must be happy now jack

I know you were dissapointed on thursday night, but things are looking up for you again eh?

You miserable miserable sod

bushranger

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #107 on: March 24, 2008, 02:23:35 PM »
I reckon with the 1 week penalty we should really play a better game next week without our fearless leader (LOL). I think we will have more direction without his plunders onfeild. Not that I'm saying that we played bad this week. I thought it was a really good game. and especially with the come back when I though the game was all done and dusted. I was so proud of the fight they had to bring it back the to take the lead and hold it to the end.
So to say I'm looking forward to next week game without our pee poor leader is an understatment. So it will be a better win and a real slap in the face to him.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14022
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #108 on: March 24, 2008, 02:56:23 PM »
what a joke. the rfc can't see that this guy is not a born leader.
he is not captain material and im sick of hearing there's no one better. thats bull sh.t

there are 3 or 4 other blokes who could do better than him. he is crap in every department.

by not being captain maybe he would get back to some half decent adelaide form.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40207
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #109 on: March 24, 2008, 04:11:39 PM »

All said it's not a capital offence. There's bigger issues in footy. So let's get on with it. Everyone has done it down an alley way.

Forget about alley ways - drive along the West Gate freeway on a Friday or Saturday night and check out the gardeners watering the trees ::)

No great surprise to me he wasn't stripped of the Captainancy - the club needs to be seen making the decisions not reacting to the supporters or the media.

Seriously we have handled it a helluva lot better than the Blues did

Time to move on ;D

"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #110 on: March 24, 2008, 05:00:58 PM »
I reckon Wallet would be spewing ;)

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #111 on: March 24, 2008, 06:09:11 PM »
I reckon Wallet would be spewing ;)

Yes and he's got plenty of friends
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #112 on: March 24, 2008, 06:30:12 PM »
I reckon Wallet would be spewing ;)

anyone with a brain is spewing...that he's such a fuckup.

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #113 on: March 24, 2008, 09:10:19 PM »

All said it's not a capital offence. There's bigger issues in footy. So let's get on with it. Everyone has done it down an alley way.

Forget about alley ways - drive along the West Gate freeway on a Friday or Saturday night and check out the gardeners watering the trees ::)

No great surprise to me he wasn't stripped of the Captainancy - the club needs to be seen making the decisions not reacting to the supporters or the media.

Seriously we have handled it a helluva lot better than the Blues did

Time to move on ;D



This has nothing to do with drunks or gardeners peeing on a freeway on a friday or sat night
This is about a supposedly club leader of an elite sporting club staying out late, being so drunk they locked him up for 4 hours after he peeed on a the wall of a police station :banghead
This is why we are the laughing stock of the AFL.
Club had the perfect opportunity to lift the standards and to make an example but they ACCEPT the penalty that he had placed on him self.
The club didnt make the decision of the penalty, KANE JOHNSON did.the club just agreed.
The club havent handled it well at all leaving it to the player to impose his own penalty, what a circus at punt road really.  $5,000 fine out of a $350,000 contract, big deal,  Hopefully the magistate will throw the book at him

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #114 on: March 24, 2008, 09:15:07 PM »
What a load of crock, Jack lol
Kane was being accountable for his actions.
Why would the club interfere with that?
You're unbelievable  :lol

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #115 on: March 24, 2008, 09:19:00 PM »
What a load of crock, Jack lol
Kane was being accountable for his actions.
Why would the club interfere with that?
You're unbelievable  :lol

You have no idea.
Kane accountable , oh dear, shown little respect for his teammates, no one gets locked up for 4 hours for being SOBER! do they ?
The club are weak as pee

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #116 on: March 24, 2008, 09:20:58 PM »
What a load of crock, Jack lol
Kane was being accountable for his actions.
Why would the club interfere with that?
You're unbelievable  :lol

You have no idea.
Kane accountable , oh dear, shown little respect for his teammates, no one gets locked up for 4 hours for being SOBER! do they ?
The club are weak as pee
That's why he's given himself a holiday dear.
Do we have to spell it out in little wordies for you  ::)
FFS?
 :rollin


Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #117 on: March 24, 2008, 09:23:49 PM »
Little wordies for you MOI,
The club is weak as pee.
Captain giving his own penalty.
Only if you knew!

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #118 on: March 24, 2008, 09:25:05 PM »
Only if you knew!
Again Jack, not interested  :sleep

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Sugar in strife doing a Fev
« Reply #119 on: March 24, 2008, 09:29:14 PM »
you are, i know ;)