Author Topic: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock  (Read 16894 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58589
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #75 on: September 10, 2008, 05:47:29 PM »
Ch 10 sport report said us, Dees and Blues will now ramp up the bidding and Warnock can expect to receive top dollar despite only playing 21 games so far.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13938
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #76 on: September 10, 2008, 06:20:51 PM »
thats stuffed.


top dollar for who???? whats his friggen name?

lets put it into perspective we are bidding close to 500k per year, for a guy who has played 21 games.

no wonder we are a joke. keep the picks and save ur cash FFS.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2008, 03:16:18 AM by one-eyed »
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

1965

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #77 on: September 10, 2008, 07:04:35 PM »
Mods

Can we do something about the bad language used by some posters?

Happy to read and (mainly ignore) the rantings of some posters but the blatant avoidance of the swear filter should not be ignored.

'65

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #78 on: September 10, 2008, 07:14:19 PM »
Mods

Can we do something about the bad language used by some posters?

Happy to read and (mainly ignore) the rantings of some posters but the blatant avoidance of the swear filter should not be ignored.

'65
Some never listen or learn

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #79 on: September 10, 2008, 07:22:07 PM »

top dollar for who???? whats his name?

lets put it into perspective we are bidding close to 500k per year, for a guy who has played 21 games.

no wonder we are a joke. keep the picks and save ur cash FFS.

When or where did the club say it was bidding close to $500k per year for Warnock?  When or where did the club even say it was bidding anything for Warnock?  Talk about perspective - deal with rumours and fact in the correct perspective.  I agree with your opinion about keeping the picks and saving our cash but don't slam the club when you base it on media scuttlebutt.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13938
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #80 on: September 10, 2008, 07:24:42 PM »
Mods

Can we do something about the bad language used by some posters?

Happy to read and (mainly ignore) the rantings of some posters but the blatant avoidance of the swear filter should not be ignored.

'65

if we pick up warnock ill be doing a lot more than avoiding the swear filter buddy.

warnock=negative

nothing wrong with cartledge for another year
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

1965

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #81 on: September 10, 2008, 07:36:19 PM »
Mods

Can we do something about the bad language used by some posters?

Happy to read and (mainly ignore) the rantings of some posters but the blatant avoidance of the swear filter should not be ignored.

'65

if we pick up warnock ill be doing a lot more than avoiding the swear filter buddy.

warnock=negative

nothing wrong with cartledge for another year

Ruck work is overrated but a 205cm Simmo, with his excellent work around the ground, would be awesome.

I don't think Warnock fits the bill.

'65

PS Why avoid the swear filter? What are you trying to prove?

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1125
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #82 on: September 10, 2008, 07:56:30 PM »
Melbourne is in the box seat & the front runner, however they are some Navy Blue murmurings from North Freo because a certain Cain Ackland will be bulleted in favour of Warnock freeing up 350 to 380k per annum first 2 years with a backloaded contract a possibility when Fev hits vet status.  :whistle

Stephen Icke (when at Freo) was involved in drafting and settling Warnock into Perth in 05, and there are always the "relocation" expenses.

Richmond should avoid Warnock as it will be expensive to get him to Tigerland.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13938
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #83 on: September 10, 2008, 08:54:33 PM »
Mods

Can we do something about the bad language used by some posters?

Happy to read and (mainly ignore) the rantings of some posters but the blatant avoidance of the swear filter should not be ignored.

'65

if we pick up warnock ill be doing a lot more than avoiding the swear filter buddy.

warnock=negative

nothing wrong with cartledge for another year

Ruck work is overrated but a 205cm Simmo, with his excellent work around the ground, would be awesome.

I don't think Warnock fits the bill.

'65

PS Why avoid the swear filter? What are you trying to prove?

i find it funny when i avoid the swear filter u guys r on to me like fly to shi. but when brackets and his crew do exactly the same u say uum NOTHING!!

who cares about swearing, r we back at school are we?

mods he said this mods he said that.

what a loser you are.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

1965

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #84 on: September 10, 2008, 09:14:53 PM »
Mods

Can we do something about the bad language used by some posters?

Happy to read and (mainly ignore) the rantings of some posters but the blatant avoidance of the swear filter should not be ignored.

'65

if we pick up warnock ill be doing a lot more than avoiding the swear filter buddy.

warnock=negative

nothing wrong with cartledge for another year

Ruck work is overrated but a 205cm Simmo, with his excellent work around the ground, would be awesome.

I don't think Warnock fits the bill.

'65

PS Why avoid the swear filter? What are you trying to prove?

i find it funny when i avoid the swear filter u guys r on to me like fly to shi. but when brackets and his crew do exactly the same u say uum NOTHING!!

who cares about swearing, r we back at school are we?

mods he said this mods he said that.

what a loser you are.



Show me where OX has avoided the swear filter.

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #85 on: September 10, 2008, 09:59:30 PM »
It is a null and void argument regardless - he is going to Melbourne. If Freo won't come to the party they will take him with their first round choice in the PSD for nothing. Carlton won't be able to do a Judd on Melbourne this time. Warnock is coming home for family reasons and with Connolly their as well Carlton, and us for that matter, will be pushing %#$^ uphill to make the trade.

So no need to worry - he won't be part of our list in 2009....even though we desperately need a ruckman like him.

Stripes

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13938
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #86 on: September 10, 2008, 10:44:53 PM »
Mods



'65


warnock=negative

nothing wrong with cartledge for another year

PS Why avoid the swear filter? What are you trying to prove?

i find it funny when i avoid the swear filter u guys r on to me like fly to shi. but when brackets and his crew do exactly the same u say uum NOTHING!!

who cares about swearing, r we back at school are we?

mods he said this mods he said that.

what a loser you are.



Show me where OX has avoided the swear filter.


Terry is smarter than March,therefore March has his back up.

Terry could play this in a way that March will never work again.

LOL March u Selfish f-wit!

The only message this sends to me is,as a player I would hold sweet FA loyalty toward the club as it
doesn't even honor contracts.

WTF Is a Hardwick gonna do - bring out the best in a team that has the finally learnt
how to play the brand of footy that TW and the coaching panel have clearly been
trying to get them to play.

Gimmee a effen break.




sorry what was that you were saying loser.

you are dealing with the best in the business buddy i would quit while your ahead.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #87 on: September 10, 2008, 11:22:31 PM »
Mods



'65


warnock=negative

nothing wrong with cartledge for another year

PS Why avoid the swear filter? What are you trying to prove?

i find it funny when i avoid the swear filter u guys r on to me like fly to shi. but when brackets and his crew do exactly the same u say uum NOTHING!!

who cares about swearing, r we back at school are we?

mods he said this mods he said that.

what a loser you are.



Show me where OX has avoided the swear filter.


Terry is smarter than March,therefore March has his back up.

Terry could play this in a way that March will never work again.

LOL March u Selfish f-wit!

The only message this sends to me is,as a player I would hold sweet FA loyalty toward the club as it
doesn't even honor contracts.

WTF Is a Hardwick gonna do - bring out the best in a team that has the finally learnt
how to play the brand of footy that TW and the coaching panel have clearly been
trying to get them to play.

Gimmee a effen break.




sorry what was that you were saying loser.

you are dealing with the best in the business buddy i would quit while your ahead.

Lol once again it all goes over Daniels head.

That's not swearing.  That's how the swear filter deals with it so it's not offensive (and F-wit doesnt count) but you would never know that because you are too busy trying to put full stops between the letters to make sure you spell it out in the offensive way for all of us and thus avoiding the swear filter.

Do you stuffing understand?  ;)  ;D
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #88 on: September 10, 2008, 11:29:26 PM »
It is a null and void argument regardless - he is going to Melbourne. If Freo won't come to the party they will take him with their first round choice in the PSD for nothing. Carlton won't be able to do a Judd on Melbourne this time. Warnock is coming home for family reasons and with Connolly their as well Carlton, and us for that matter, will be pushing %#$^ uphill to make the trade.

So no need to worry - he won't be part of our list in 2009....even though we desperately need a ruckman like him.

Stripes

I can't see Freo giving him away for nothing. they would take a mid 2nd pick before that happened imv. Say Pick 26.
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond interested in young Freo ruckman Warnock
« Reply #89 on: September 10, 2008, 11:41:20 PM »
Guys I love coming on here and reading everyone's posts
Logical opinions
Learned opinions
Stupid Opinions
Left Field Opinions
All add to the character that is our forum, but please does every thread have to degenerate into a slagging match? As a neutral observer who merely has a love for the RFC and a kind regard for all posters on here who for all intents and purposes I may sit next to at Richmond games without knowing it. Yet I hate coming on here scrolling through the posts and playing computer monitor tennis watching insults fly back and forward that have nothing to do with the topic when all I really want to do is express an opinion/thought and read the other ones on here.

For the record I feel that the money on Warnock's head is way way too much and we would be better off keeping our other ruckman. Possibly giving Graham a go next year.
We have Graham Patto and Putt for better and worse. Keep the faith save our money let others pay the exhorbitant price. Let's keep the money to pay our current crop of kids like Lids Cotch and co when they are out of contract. :thumbsup