To those that say our goalkicking didn't matter to the end result......
We had more scoring shots for over 3/4ers of the game and until after the Blues had hit the front in the last quarter. They had something like 11 of the last 14 scoring shots of which 7 were goals. We had our chances to put them away well before then.
From memory our first 9 shots on goal:
Browny tries to kick a difficult one off the ground - miss
Morton 15 out on a 60 degree angle - miss
Browny with the same shot as Morton - miss
Newy runs to 40 directly in front - miss
Browny receives handball from Cotchin in space runs to 35 on a 20 degree angle - miss
Morton gets another chance same as his first shot - goal
Browny from 45 on a 45 degree angle outer side - miss
Lids same shot as Browny after the siren - goal
IIRC the one I'm missing was rushed.
I don't care what Carlton did. No control over that. Port had more scoring shots last week but we won because we kicked straight. Dogs had more scoring shots but we drew. We had more scoring shots against St Kilda but lost. We control our goalkicking and most of those misses above are unforgivable at any level let alone AFL. I don't care what anyone says. And you can't blame fatigue in the first quarter either
. When you add Hughes and Simmo's goals early in the 2nd quarter it should have been game over. Browny missed another gimme straight after Simmo's goal too which Carlton ran up the ground for their 2nd goal. So instead of an 8 goal lead it was back to under 2 goals. But hey keep telling me it made no difference!
I'm not saying the tactics, match-ups and tags aren't important but the game could and should have been over by the 10 minute mark of the 2nd quarter. People including those at AFL clubs severely neglect the importance of accurate goalkicking to winning games. At the end of the day it's the whole point to the sport.