Author Topic: Luxbet officially our new major co-sponsor  (Read 65508 times)

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #285 on: December 21, 2008, 08:37:22 AM »
What does Eddie think?  :lol

Sad but true.   >:(

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5369
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #286 on: December 21, 2008, 11:45:40 AM »
$2.4 million for 3 years?

how much was AIG's deal?

if Sportsbet is more, hope they come on board!

that would be billiant

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41211
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #287 on: December 21, 2008, 02:52:37 PM »
RICHMOND this week will front the AFL seeking approval of a multi-million-dollar three-year sponsorship deal with bookmaking firm Sportsbet.

Bring it on I say....

 ;D

 :gotigers


how much was AIG's deal?


torch, there wasn't an AIG deal... our previous co-major sponsor was AFG  :-\








"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

bushranger

  • Guest
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #288 on: December 21, 2008, 04:05:20 PM »
If we have the same run as we did with the Polak/Cousins thing, we better start holding our breaths.

richmondrules

  • Guest
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #289 on: December 21, 2008, 05:22:48 PM »
RICHMOND this week will front the AFL seeking approval of a multi-million-dollar three-year sponsorship deal with bookmaking firm Sportsbet.

Bring it on I say....

 ;D

 :gotigers


how much was AIG's deal?


torch, there wasn't an AIG deal... our previous co-major sponsor was AFG  :-\


That would be $0 for the AIG deal then. I think the Sportsbet deal will be comfortably larger.

Offline Hes My Hero

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 399
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #290 on: December 21, 2008, 06:11:25 PM »
Can someone tell me if the Sportsbet deal is :

2.4 m per year for 3 years
or
2.4 m over 3 years = $800,000 per year ?

Wasn't AFG giving us 800 g's per year ?
I beleive that would probably be the minimum for a co major sponsor.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14245
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #291 on: December 21, 2008, 06:58:26 PM »
if the AFL dont approve this deal they can all go get stuffed.

if it was the pies it would have been granted already.

the afl better do the right thing here or that Andy d needs to be put away

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #292 on: December 21, 2008, 07:22:07 PM »
if the AFL dont approve this deal they can all go get stuffed.

if it was the pies it would have been granted already.

the afl better do the right thing here or that Andy d needs to be put away



I think you'll find that it isn't just up to the AFL - it is either with the current sponsors consent or they have to talk the current sponsor around to allowing an exception.

The one problem with sponsorship - and major sponsorship in particular is that some of the companies think they own the sporting body that they are sponsoring.

I hope the AFL are able to talk around Centrebet (or whoever it is).
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14245
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #293 on: December 21, 2008, 07:37:57 PM »
if the AFL dont approve this deal they can all go get stuffed.

if it was the pies it would have been granted already.

the afl better do the right thing here or that Andy d needs to be put away



I think you'll find that it isn't just up to the AFL - it is either with the current sponsors consent or they have to talk the current sponsor around to allowing an exception.

The one problem with sponsorship - and major sponsorship in particular is that some of the companies think they own the sporting body that they are sponsoring.

I hope the AFL are able to talk around Centrebet (or whoever it is).

isnt Qantas a sponsor of the Kick smart program and Emirates sponsor of the pies.

Im telling you the AFl can push it in our favour IF they want to
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #294 on: December 21, 2008, 07:41:54 PM »
if the AFL dont approve this deal they can all go get stuffed.

if it was the pies it would have been granted already.

the afl better do the right thing here or that Andy d needs to be put away



I

I think you'll find that it isn't just up to the AFL - it is either with the current sponsors consent or they have to talk the current sponsor around to allowing an exception.

The one problem with sponsorship - and major sponsorship in particular is that some of the companies think they own the sporting body that they are sponsoring.

I hope the AFL are able to talk around Centrebet (or whoever it is).

isnt Qantas a sponsor of the Kick smart program and Emirates sponsor of the pies.

Im telling you the AFl can push it in our favour IF they want to

t depends on the deal. I worked for a company that had a minor - and I mean minor - conflict with a major sponsor and the AFL were not permitted to enter an arrangement with us due to the exclusivity contract signed up by that sponsor.

Unless the AFL's lawyers have become a bit more savvy, there are some sponsors out there that fair dinkum ride roughshod all over the AFL when it comes to the big money deals. Lets hope this isn't one of them
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Fwoy3

  • Un-unRichmondlike
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Shut the eff up Jack!
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #295 on: December 21, 2008, 08:30:12 PM »
So what are the odds it'll get thru? :whistle :P
My parents bought me a Richmond jumper and enrolled me in a junior footy clinic in 1981...look at me now.

bushranger

  • Guest
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #296 on: December 21, 2008, 08:32:41 PM »
Lets bloody hope a better than good chance.
It all benifits the AFL in the long run, as we don't sit there waiting to be spoon fed like the Demons.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41211
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #297 on: December 21, 2008, 08:50:10 PM »
Can someone tell me if the Sportsbet deal is :

2.4 m per year for 3 years
or
2.4 m over 3 years = $800,000 per year ?

Wasn't AFG giving us 800 g's per year ?
I beleive that would probably be the minimum for a co major sponsor.

Ii read it as $2.4 over 3 years which would sound about right

Although I rarely believe the numbers the media throw around

isnt Qantas a sponsor of the Kick smart program and Emirates sponsor of the pies.

Im telling you the AFl can push it in our favour IF they want to

Daniel, rightly or wrongly the argument is that the Pies Emirates deal does not conflict with the AFL's sponsorship arrangement with QANTAS because Emirates doesn't fly domestically in Australia and the QANTAS deal is based on domestic travel of teams in the AFL competition.

Virgin Blue cannot sponsor an AFL team because of the sponsorship. Ditto Tiger Airways... QANTAS as a "protected" AFL sponsor would need to agree and they wouldn't.

The HUN report says Betfair has no objection to deal but it also only mentions Tabcorp as a protected sponsors. As a person who has no interest in betting at all, my question is Tabcorp and Sportsbet direct competitors?

So what are the odds it'll get thru? :whistle :P

I'd like to think good  ;) but this is the AFL we are talking about ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #298 on: December 21, 2008, 09:48:23 PM »
Can someone tell me if the Sportsbet deal is :

2.4 m per year for 3 years
or
2.4 m over 3 years = $800,000 per year ?

Wasn't AFG giving us 800 g's per year ?
I beleive that would probably be the minimum for a co major sponsor.

Maybe they have negotiated smarter contracts this time around. I would describe the competitive threat of our company as significantly less than that of Emirates (sounds ridiculous well it's true) and we were not allowed to be involved about 7 years ago.
I would imagine that the AFL would be only too happy to push the sponsorship through - it is in their interests too, the key is their sponsor allowing it or that the restrictions in the contract do not prevent our sponsorship going through.

Fingers crossed.

Ii read it as $2.4 over 3 years which would sound about right

Although I rarely believe the numbers the media throw around

isnt Qantas a sponsor of the Kick smart program and Emirates sponsor of the pies.

Im telling you the AFl can push it in our favour IF they want to

Daniel, rightly or wrongly the argument is that the Pies Emirates deal does not conflict with the AFL's sponsorship arrangement with QANTAS because Emirates doesn't fly domestically in Australia and the QANTAS deal is based on domestic travel of teams in the AFL competition.

Virgin Blue cannot sponsor an AFL team because of the sponsorship. Ditto Tiger Airways... QANTAS as a "protected" AFL sponsor would need to agree and they wouldn't.

The HUN report says Betfair has no objection to deal but it also only mentions Tabcorp as a protected sponsors. As a person who has no interest in betting at all, my question is Tabcorp and Sportsbet direct competitors?

So what are the odds it'll get thru? :whistle :P

I'd like to think good  ;) but this is the AFL we are talking about ;D
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: New major sponsor news [merged]
« Reply #299 on: December 21, 2008, 10:14:59 PM »
tabcorp are a large conglomerate owning Casinos, Pokies and wagering...It is the wagering on sports where they would compete directly with sportsbet. I dont think they would roll over...the afl may offer tabcorp a sweetner to allow their consent if the current contract is restrictive.....In the current climate I am certain the league will be doing all they can to mantain viability and avoid handouts to keep clubs afloat...if things get crook ...those grants may get a serious workout :-\
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled